To Activate English Learning: Listen and Speak in Real Life Context with an AR Featured U-Learning System

Introduction Technological advancements in wireless applications and the popularity of mobile devices have created great advantages and opportunities for learning (Huang & Chiu, 2015; Hsieh et al., 2016). As a natural complement to ubiquitous computing, AR provides an intuitive and interactive interface to a three-dimensional information space embedded within physical reality. The application of Augmented Reality (AR) with context-aware ubiquitous learning (u-learning) systems offers considerable advantages for English as a foreign language (EFL) learning. EFL learners often confront difficulties and challenges when they need to speak English in real life settings. Contextual learning environments have been proven to improve performance in EFL learning (Sandberg et al., 2011). Context-aware ubiquitous learning (u-learning) refers to the computer systems that seamlessly integrate into our everyday life. It is a version of our future computing lifestyle in which providing services and information occurs anywhere and anytime. Researchers have found positive outcomes in the use of mobile devices for English language learners. Kolb (1984) emphasized learning is constructed and contextual which relies on an engagement with social interactions and experience from the real world (De Freitas & Neumann, 2009). Based on Kolb's arguments, we intend to design and develop a U-Learning Instruction System with Augment Reality Features (UL-IAR) to help users to learn EFL in real life contexts. Our UL-IAR allows users to learn EFL in a constructed and contextual environment that involves social interactions and experience. Despite prior studies have considered the technical affordances of u-learning, there is an ongoing need to examine pedagogies that are suitable for u-learning to inform teacher practice, policy makers, curriculum developers, and teacher education (Pegrum et al., 2013). To implement a context-aware u-learning system for EFL learners, we further design learning strategies for different individuals. We believe that individual difference also leads to different learning performance in using u-learning systems. The individual differentiation can be discerned through cognitive styles, learning styles, cognitive control, and intelligence (Jonassen & Grabowski, 1993). The design of learning systems must consider individuals' cognitive styles which would increase the efficacy and satisfaction of the learning experience. However, the performance outcomes of distinct cognitive styles that applied to new learning technologies remain inconclusive (Dillon & Gabbard, 1998). This knowledge gap highlights the need to examine the difference between cognitive styles in u-learning systems with AR. Therefore, our research objective is to empirically examine the learning performance of u-learning system with different learning strategies and cognitive styles. Overall, this paper intends to answer the following research questions. * What kind of learning strategy leads to better EFL learning performance when using UL-IAR? * Do the users with different cognitive styles have different learning performance when using UL-IAR? * Is there best alignment between learning strategies and cognitive styles when using UL-IAR? This paper is organized as follows. We first review the definitions and studies of u-learning, augmented reality, and cognitive styles. We then show our research method which includes system design and development, experimental design and experiment participants. Last, we discuss our research results and findings and conclude theoretical and practical findings, limitations, and future research. Literature review This section reviews the definitions and studies of ubiquitous learning, the applications of augmented reality in education, and cognitive styles. Ubiquitous learning Ubiquitous learning (u-learning) refers to a ubiquitous learning environment that enables individuals to conduct learning activities in the right place and right time. …

[1]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Apply an Augmented Reality in a Mobile Guidance to Increase Sense of Place for Heritage Places , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Hsien-Sheng Hsiao,et al.  Weather observers: a manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[3]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  The effectiveness of the meaningful learning-based evaluation for different achieving students in a ubiquitous learning context , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Sherry Y. Chen,et al.  The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: Cognitive styles vs. prior ability , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Mario Soflano,et al.  Learning style analysis in adaptive GBL application to teach SQL , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area 1 , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Sheng-Wen Hsieh,et al.  The Effects of Concept Map- Oriented Gesture-Based Teaching System on Learners' Learning Performance and Cognitive Load in Earth Science Course , 2016 .

[9]  A. Spanjer,et al.  Embedded-Figures Performance and Telecourse Achievement , 1988 .

[10]  Jorge Bacca,et al.  Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Jia Zhang,et al.  The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Tan-Hsu Tan,et al.  Outdoor Natural Science Learning with an RFID-Supported Immersive Ubiquitous Learning Environment , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Oliver Müller,et al.  Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  A Mobile Device and Online System with Contextual Familiarity and its Effects on English Learning on Campus , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Mark Pegrum,et al.  Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools , 2013 .

[19]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  Hsinyi Peng,et al.  From Virtual Environments to Physical Environments: Exploring Interactivity in Ubiquitous-learning Systems , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  S. Easton,et al.  Clarifying the Instructor's Role in Online Distance Learning , 2003 .

[22]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Decision-Tree-Oriented Guidance Mechanism for Conducting Nature Science Observation Activities in a Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environment , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[24]  Sherry Y. Chen,et al.  Matching/mismatching in web-based learning: a perspective based on cognitive styles and physiological factors , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Effects of teaching and learning styles on students' reflection levels for ubiquitous learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Carlos Delgado-Kloos,et al.  Augmented Reality-Based Simulators as Discovery Learning Tools: An Empirical Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[27]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Sara de Freitas,et al.  The use of 'exploratory learning' for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Carmen R. Wilson VanVoorhis,et al.  Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes , 2007 .

[30]  Min Liu,et al.  The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment , 1994 .

[31]  Jacobijn Sandberg,et al.  Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study , 2000 .

[33]  Bor-Chen Kuo,et al.  Adaptively Ubiquitous Learning in Campus Math Path , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[35]  Sanghee Yeo Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[36]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[37]  Minjuan Wang,et al.  From Learning Object to Learning Cell: A Resource Organization Model for Ubiquitous Learning , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[38]  Bernard M. Frank,et al.  The Effect of Learners' Field Independence, Cognitive Strategy Instruction, and Inherent Word-List Organization on Free-Recall Memory and Strategy Use , 1993 .

[39]  Neven A. M. El Sayed Applying Augmented Reality Techniques in the Field of Education: "ARSC: Augmented Reality Student Card" An Augmented Reality Solution for The Education Field , 2011 .

[40]  Yongtian Wang,et al.  Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Field dependence-independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[43]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[44]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[45]  Maria del Carmen Juan Lizandra,et al.  Evaluation of learning outcomes using an educational iPhone game vs. traditional game , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Designing ubiquitous computing to enhance children's learning in museums , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[47]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[48]  Xenia Xistouri,et al.  Field dependence/independence cognitive style and problem posing: an investigation with sixth grade students , 2011 .

[49]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[50]  Sharon L. Weinberg,et al.  Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using SPSS , 2002 .

[51]  Fu-Yun Yu,et al.  Cooperative Weblog Learning in Higher Education: Its Facilitating Effects on Social Interaction, Time Lag, and Cognitive Load , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[52]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  Mobile Seamless Technology Enhanced CSL Oral Communication , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..