Financial reporting websites : what users want in terms of form and content

Web-based financial reporting varies widely. Our research had three objectives: (1) identify design attributes for Web-based financial reporting; (2) rank those attributes; and (3) pilot test the Web as a survey tool. Sixty-one attributes were developed from prior studies. The subjects were the subscribers of the ?Double Entries? email newsletter. In terms of completeness, the respondents suggested seven additional attributes. Regarding the second objective, some surprises were found. For example, the Jenkins Report emphasizes forward-looking information; yet, the respondents rated traditional content higher than forward-looking information. Traditional static attributes were rated higher than dynamic attributes. In terms of presentation, the respondents were moderately adverse to downloading files, gave relatively low ratings to ?bells and whistles,? preferred hyperlinks and other navigation aids such tables of content over search and query functions. Regarding the third objective, the response rate was 13.2%, which was at the low end of response rates reported by similar projects.

[1]  E. Fama.  Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[2]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  Corporate Financial Statements, A Product of the Market and Political Processes , 1977 .

[3]  Hermann A. Maurer,et al.  Glimpses at the future of networked hypermedia systems , 1996 .

[4]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[5]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  Using E-mail To Survey Internet Users In The United States: Methodology And Assessment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  C. Weber,et al.  A survey on the use of the Internet for investor relations in the USA, the UK and Germany , 1999 .

[7]  Alan C.B. Tse,et al.  Comparing Two Methods of Sending out Questionnaires: E-mail versus Mail , 1995 .

[8]  Alfred Wagenhofer,et al.  Financial information on the Internet: a survey of the homepages of Austrian companies , 1999 .

[9]  Michael Bieber,et al.  Designing hypermedia applications , 1995, CACM.

[10]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  State of the Art Review on Hypermedia Issues And Applications , 1999 .

[11]  Christine B. Smith,et al.  Casting the Net: Surveying an Internet Population , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Navigation in hypertext: A critical review of the concept , 1990, INTERACT.

[13]  J. Stanton.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF DATA COLLECTION USING THE INTERNET , 1998 .

[14]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Internet Information Sources. , 1997 .

[15]  F. Langerak,et al.  Non-Probability Sampling for WWW Surveys: A Comparison of Methods , 1998 .

[16]  Marinus J. Bouwman,et al.  How do financial analysts make decisions? A process model of the investment screening decision , 1987 .

[17]  Ray McAleese,et al.  Navigation and Browsing in Hypertext , 1999, UK Hypertext.

[18]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[19]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  E-Mail as a Research Tool , 2003 .

[20]  Terry D. Warfield,et al.  Corporate Reporting on the Internet , 1999 .

[21]  John Arnold,et al.  A Survey of the Methods Used by UK Investment Analysts to Appraise Investments in Ordinary Shares , 1984 .

[22]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[23]  S. Kotha.  Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[24]  J. Pitkow,et al.  Surveying the Territory: GVU's Five WWW User Surveys , 1997 .

[25]  Gerald Trites.  The impact of technology of financial and business reporting , 1999 .

[26]  Ray R. Larson,et al.  Hypertext hands-on!: An introduction to a new way of organizing and accessing information , 1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[27]  Maristella Agosti,et al.  Information Retrieval and Hypertext , 1996, Information Retrieval and Hypertext.

[28]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Multimedia and Hypertext: The Internet and Beyond , 1995 .