Iterative Schemes for Coupled Multiphysical Problems in Electrical Engineering

Abstract Multiphysical simulations become increasingly important for engineering applications due to the high accuracy of domain-specific modeling and numerical simulations; effects that were previously disregraded may become dominant. For this a monolithic approach, i.e., the solution of all subproblems in one system, is often cumbersome or even impossible because incompatible algorithms or software packages are involved. Thus simulation engineers need to “weakly”, i.e., each problem is tackled separately, couple subproblems in an stable and efficient way. For example for time-dependent problems where different time scales are present, waveform relaxation schemes are a promising approach that still allows for an efficient simulation of the problem. However, the independent treatment introduces splitting errors, which should be mitigated by iterative procedures that in turn can cause computational overhead. In this contributions we discuss theoretical and practical issues as the existence and uniqueness of solutions, accuracy, stability, convergence and numerical efficiency of the schemes. Advantages and disadvantages are addressed by examples from electrical engineering.

[1]  Andreas Bartel,et al.  A Cosimulation Framework for Multirate Time Integration of Field/Circuit Coupled Problems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  Albert E. Ruehli,et al.  WAVEFORM RELAXATION: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1985 .

[3]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  DAE-Index and Convergence Analysis of Lumped Electric Circuits Refined by 3-D Magnetoquasistatic Conductor Models , 2010 .

[4]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Dynamic Iteration for Coupled Problems of Electric Circuits and Distributed Devices , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Michael Günther,et al.  Preconditioned Dynamic Iteration for Coupled Differential-Algebraic Systems , 2001 .

[6]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Structural analysis of electrical circuits including magnetoquasistatic devices , 2011 .

[7]  Hamid Reza Shaker,et al.  Proceedings MATHMOD 09 Vienna , 2009 .

[8]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  On the convergence rate of dynamic iteration for coupled problems with multiple subsystems , 2014, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[9]  Thomas Weiland,et al.  Winding functions in transient magnetoquasistatic field-circuit coupled simulations , 2013 .

[10]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  A Convergent Iteration Scheme for Semiconductor/Circuit Coupled Problems , 2012 .

[11]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Coupled Heat-Electromagnetic Simulation of Inductive Charging Stations for Electric Vehicles , 2012 .

[12]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Fitting Lumped Machine Models on the Fly , 2010 .

[13]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Aspects of Coupled Problems in Computational Electromagnetics Formulations , 2012 .

[14]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  An Optimal p‐Refinement Strategy for Dynamic Iteration of Ordinary and Differential Algebraic Equations , 2013 .

[15]  Zdzislaw Jackiewicz,et al.  Convergence of Waveform Relaxation Methods for Differential-Algebraic Systems , 1996 .

[16]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Efficient frequency-transient co-simulation of coupled heat-electromagnetic problems , 2014 .

[17]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Isogeometric simulation of Lorentz detuning in superconducting accelerator cavities , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  Prashanth K. Vijalapura,et al.  Fractional step methods for index-1 differential-algebraic equations , 2005 .

[19]  Markus Brunk,et al.  Positivity preserving discretization of time dependent semiconductor drift-diffusion equations , 2012 .

[20]  Janne Roos,et al.  Scientific computing in electrical engineering : SCEE 2008 , 2010 .