Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations

OBJECTIVE Through colonoscopy, polyps can be identified and removed to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Appropriate use of surveillance colonoscopy, post polypectomy, is a focus of healthcare reform. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors developed and implemented the first electronic medical record-based colonoscopy reporting system (CoRS) that matches endoscopic findings with guideline-consistent surveillance recommendations and generates tailored results and recommendation letters for patients and providers. RESULTS In its first year, CoRS was used in 98.6% of indicated cases. Via a survey, colonoscopists agreed/strongly agreed it is easy to use (83%), provides guideline-based recommendations (89%), improves quality of Spanish letters (94%), they would recommend it for other institutions (78%), and it made their work easier (61%), and led to improved practice (56%). DISCUSSION CoRS' widespread adoption and acceptance likely resulted from stakeholder engagement throughout the development and implementation process. CONCLUSION CoRS is well-accepted by clinicians and provides guideline-based recommendations and results communications to patients and providers.

[1]  Laura R. Olevitch,et al.  Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology , 1999 .

[2]  O. Brawley,et al.  Racial disparities in colorectal cancer. , 2007, Current problems in cancer.

[3]  R. Hayes,et al.  Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[4]  P. Newcomb,et al.  A Randomized Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Screening in Members of High-Risk Families in the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry and Cancer Genetics Network , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[6]  James S Goodwin,et al.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use — United States, 2012 , 2013, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[9]  G. Willis,et al.  Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design , 2004 .

[10]  S. Saini,et al.  Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[11]  L. Morimoto,et al.  Differences in colorectal carcinoma stage and survival by race and ethnicity , 2005, Cancer.

[12]  Electronic Medical Records and Improving the Quality of the Screening Process , 2011, Journal of general internal medicine.

[13]  Jeffrey K. Springston,et al.  Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans. , 2012, Health education research.

[14]  Yingye Zheng,et al.  The Colorectal Cancer Screening Process in Community Settings: A Conceptual Model for the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens Consortium , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  L. Seeff,et al.  Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Test Use, Including CT Colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Increasing colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the carpentry trade: test of risk communication interventions. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[17]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Lack of reduction in racial disparities in cancer‐specific mortality over a 20‐year period , 2014, Cancer.

[18]  E. Ellerbeck,et al.  Disparities in colorectal cancer screening: a guideline-based analysis of adherence. , 2006, Ethnicity & disease.

[19]  D. Lieberman Colon polyp surveillance: clinical decision tool. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[20]  Robert H Fletcher,et al.  Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society * , † , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[21]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[22]  C. Voils,et al.  Understanding Gastroenterologist Adherence to Polyp Surveillance Guidelines , 2012, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[23]  S. Saini,et al.  Why Don't Gastroenterologists Follow Colon Polyp Surveillance Guidelines?: Results of a National Survey , 2009, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[24]  Chyke A Doubeni,et al.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Accuracy of self-reports of fecal occult blood tests and test results among individuals in the carpentry trade. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[26]  Shelly J. Clark,et al.  Impact of the cancer risk intake system on patient-clinician discussions of tamoxifen, genetic counseling, and colonoscopy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.