Rational Diversification of a Promoter Providing Fine-Tuned Expression and Orthogonal Regulation for Synthetic Biology

Yeast is an ideal organism for the development and application of synthetic biology, yet there remain relatively few well-characterised biological parts suitable for precise engineering of this chassis. In order to address this current need, we present here a strategy that takes a single biological part, a promoter, and re-engineers it to produce a fine-graded output range promoter library and new regulated promoters desirable for orthogonal synthetic biology applications. A highly constitutive Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoter, PFY1p, was identified by bioinformatic approaches, characterised in vivo and diversified at its core sequence to create a 36-member promoter library. TetR regulation was introduced into PFY1p to create a synthetic inducible promoter (iPFY1p) that functions in an inverter device. Orthogonal and scalable regulation of synthetic promoters was then demonstrated for the first time using customisable Transcription Activator-Like Effectors (TALEs) modified and designed to act as orthogonal repressors for specific PFY1-based promoters. The ability to diversify a promoter at its core sequences and then independently target Transcription Activator-Like Orthogonal Repressors (TALORs) to virtually any of these sequences shows great promise toward the design and construction of future synthetic gene networks that encode complex “multi-wire” logic functions.

[1]  Matthew J. Moscou,et al.  A Simple Cipher Governs DNA Recognition by TAL Effectors , 2009, Science.

[2]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  Synthetic promoter libraries--tuning of gene expression. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  A Synthetic Genetic Edge Detection Program , 2009, Cell.

[4]  Olga G. Troyanskaya,et al.  Coordinated Concentration Changes of Transcripts and Metabolites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  A. Bogdanove,et al.  TAL Effectors: Customizable Proteins for DNA Targeting , 2011, Science.

[6]  J Craig Venter,et al.  One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  J. Collins,et al.  Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Kwok Five hard truths for synthetic biology , 2010, Nature.

[9]  Charles Boone,et al.  Identifying transcription factor functions and targets by phenotypic activation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Merja Penttilä,et al.  Low oxygen levels as a trigger for enhancement of respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[11]  J. Pronk,et al.  Two-dimensional Transcriptome Analysis in Chemostat Cultures , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Simone Hahn,et al.  A Bacterial Effector Acts as a Plant Transcription Factor and Induces a Cell Size Regulator , 2007, Science.

[13]  J. Strathern,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics : a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual , 2005 .

[14]  C. V. Rao,et al.  Expanding the synthetic biology toolbox: engineering orthogonal regulators of gene expression. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[15]  J. Lopes,et al.  Multiple bHLH proteins regulate CIT2 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, Yeast.

[16]  James J. Collins,et al.  Next-Generation Synthetic Gene Networks , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[18]  Kai Li,et al.  Exploring the functional landscape of gene expression: directed search of large microarray compendia , 2007, Bioinform..

[19]  L. Guarente,et al.  Heme regulates transcription of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae via an upstream activation site , 1983, Cell.

[20]  P. Laybourn,et al.  RNA polymerase II and TBP occupy the repressed CYC1 promoter , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[21]  K. Kwast,et al.  Metabolic-State-Dependent Remodeling of the Transcriptome in Response to Anoxia and Subsequent Reoxygenation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Eukaryotic Cell.

[22]  Jens Boch,et al.  TALEs of genome targeting , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Joel S. Bader,et al.  Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design , 2011, Nature.

[24]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[25]  U. Oechsner,et al.  Reb1p-dependent DNA Bending Effects Nucleosome Positioning and Constitutive Transcription at the Yeast Profilin Promoter* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  J. Collins,et al.  DIVERSITY-BASED, MODEL-GUIDED CONSTRUCTION OF SYNTHETIC GENE NETWORKS WITH PREDICTED FUNCTIONS , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Opportunities for yeast metabolic engineering: Lessons from synthetic biology , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[28]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Strategy of Transcription Regulation in the Budding Yeast , 2007, PloS one.

[29]  E. Lander,et al.  Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[30]  Timothy K Lu,et al.  Engineering scalable biological systems , 2010, Bioengineered bugs.

[31]  D. Bernardo,et al.  A Yeast Synthetic Network for In Vivo Assessment of Reverse-Engineering and Modeling Approaches , 2009, Cell.

[32]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[33]  Jens Boch,et al.  Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors , 2009, Science.

[34]  David A. Drubin,et al.  Rational design of memory in eukaryotic cells. , 2007, Genes & development.

[35]  E. Siggia,et al.  Analysis of Combinatorial cis-Regulation in Synthetic and Genomic Promoters , 2008, Nature.

[36]  Mauricio Barahona,et al.  Transient dynamics around unstable periodic orbits in the generalized repressilator model. , 2010, Chaos.

[37]  Philip Bradley,et al.  The Crystal Structure of TAL Effector PthXo1 Bound to Its DNA Target , 2012, Science.

[38]  J. Lopes,et al.  Cis and trans regulatory elements required for regulation of the CHO1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  David Botstein,et al.  Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein–DNA association , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[40]  C. Smolke,et al.  Advancing secondary metabolite biosynthesis in yeast with synthetic biology tools. , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[41]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Integrated Gene Circuits , 2011, Science.

[42]  J. Pronk,et al.  Role of Transcriptional Regulation in Controlling Fluxes in Central Carbon Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  Edith D. Wong,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  L. Breeden,et al.  Conserved homeodomain proteins interact with MADS box protein Mcm1 to restrict ECB-dependent transcription to the M/G1 phase of the cell cycle. , 2002, Genes & development.

[45]  Erin L. Doyle,et al.  Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  David Botstein,et al.  Nutritional homeostasis in batch and steady-state culture of yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[47]  S. Letovsky,et al.  Quantification of the yeast transcriptome by single-molecule sequencing , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[48]  M. Hattori,et al.  A large-scale full-length cDNA analysis to explore the budding yeast transcriptome , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Marek S Skrzypek,et al.  Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) for analysis of genomic information. , 2011, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[50]  J. Hansen,et al.  The dynamics of the Saccharomyces carlsbergensis brewing yeast transcriptome during a production-scale lager beer fermentation. , 2002, FEMS yeast research.

[51]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[52]  Laura E. Dixon,et al.  A switchable light-input, light-output system modelled and constructed in yeast , 2009, Journal of biological engineering.

[53]  J. Stolz,et al.  Biotin Sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Mediated by a Conserved DNA Element and Requires the Activity of Biotin-Protein Ligase* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  U. Oechsner,et al.  The intron-containing gene for yeast profilin (PFY) encodes a vital function. , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[55]  Eulàlia de Nadal,et al.  The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes , 2004, Nature.

[56]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  Artificial promoters for metabolic optimization. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[57]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[58]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[59]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[60]  M. Gerstein,et al.  The Transcriptional Landscape of the Yeast Genome Defined by RNA Sequencing , 2008, Science.

[61]  Simone Hahn,et al.  Plant Pathogen Recognition Mediated by Promoter Activation of the Pepper Bs3 Resistance Gene , 2007, Science.

[62]  D. Endy Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[63]  H. Thiesen,et al.  Krüppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional repression domains. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[65]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[66]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Engineering life: building a fab for biology. , 2006, Scientific American.

[67]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Induction of multiple pleiotropic drug resistance genes in yeast engineered to produce an increased level of anti-malarial drug precursor, artemisinic acid , 2008, BMC biotechnology.

[68]  Nieng Yan,et al.  Structural Basis for Sequence-Specific Recognition of DNA by TAL Effectors , 2012, Science.

[69]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Transcriptome profiling to identify genes involved in peroxisome assembly and function , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[70]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  Homeostatic adjustment and metabolic remodeling in glucose-limited yeast cultures. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[71]  F. Dietrich,et al.  Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5′ SAGE , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[72]  Garima Goyal,et al.  Surface Display of a Functional Minicellulosome by Intracellular Complementation Using a Synthetic Yeast Consortium and Its Application to Cellulose Hydrolysis and Ethanol Production , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[73]  Jingdong Tian,et al.  Circular polymerase extension cloning for high-throughput cloning of complex and combinatorial DNA libraries , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[74]  D. Pincus,et al.  In silico feedback for in vivo regulation of a gene expression circuit , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[75]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[76]  S. Ho,et al.  Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. , 1989, Gene.

[77]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  The level of glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains , 2003, Yeast.