Evaluating the effectiveness of organic chemistry textbooks in promoting representational fluency and understanding of 2D–3D diagrammatic relationships

The use of two-dimensional (2D) representations to communicate and reason about micromolecular phenomena is common practice in chemistry. While experts are adept at using such representations, research suggests that novices often exhibit great difficulty in understanding, manipulating, and translating between various representational forms. When used in conjunction with 2D illustrations, concrete and virtual models have been shown to increase novice understanding of 2D representations. However, such models are not always readily available. For this reason, it is vital that 2D textbook illustrations promote representational and diagrammatic competence. In this study, we use a self-designed rubric to evaluate the degree to which Newman (NPs) and Fischer Projections (FPs) are accurately introduced and described in seven frequently used Organic Chemistry textbooks. Additionally, we evaluate the success of these texts in including practice problems that encourage students to develop representational fluency by translating between different 2D diagrams. Results suggest that while most texts do a relatively thorough job of introducing the FP and NP, these introductions could be improved. Recommendations for how texts might increase novices' representational fluency through enhanced use of multi-representational examples, attention to molecule dynamics, and explicit characterization of the relationships between 3D molecules and their 2D projections are discussed.

[1]  Stephen J. Hawkes,et al.  Salts are Mostly Not Ionized , 1996 .

[2]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[3]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[4]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[5]  Mark J. Waner Particulate Pictures and Kinetic-Molecular Theory Concepts: Seizing an Opportunity , 2010 .

[6]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[7]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Towards a Better Utilization of Diagrams in Research into the Use of Representative Levels in Chemical Education , 2009 .

[8]  Pamela J. Garnett,et al.  Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning , 1995 .

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text , 1995 .

[10]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[11]  W. Howard Levie,et al.  Effects of text illustrations: A review of research , 1982 .

[12]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Molecular visualization in chemistry education: The role of multidisciplinary collaboration , 2005 .

[13]  Michael J. Stroud,et al.  Summoning Prior Knowledge Through Metaphorical Graphics: An Example in Chemistry Instruction , 2010 .

[14]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[15]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Spatial Ability and its Role in Organic Chemistry: A Study of Four Organic Courses. , 1987 .

[16]  D. C. Jacobs,et al.  TextRev: A Window into How General and Organic Chemistry Students Use Textbook Resources. , 2003 .

[17]  C. King An Analysis of Misconceptions in Science Textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales , 2010 .

[18]  Jeffrey R. Appling,et al.  Instructional Technology and Molecular Visualization , 2004 .

[19]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education , 2005 .

[20]  Vesna Ferk,et al.  Students' understanding of molecular structure representations , 2003 .

[21]  Mary A. LaRussa,et al.  A STUDY OF TWO MEASURES OF SPATIAL ABILITY AS PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS IN DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY , 1987 .

[22]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Identifying Representational Competence With Multi-Representational Displays , 2011 .

[23]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[24]  Mauro Mocerino,et al.  Learning at the Sub-micro Level: Structural Representations , 2009 .

[25]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[26]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Teaching and Learning with Three-dimensional Representations , 2005 .

[27]  M. Stieff Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science , 2007 .

[28]  M. Newman,et al.  A notation for the study of certain stereochemical problems , 1955 .

[29]  Roy W. Clark,et al.  Textbook Error: Short Circuiting an Electrochemical Cell , 2007 .

[30]  A. Dumon,et al.  The acquisition of stereochemical knowledge by Algerian students intending to teach physical sciences , 2011 .

[31]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry , 1995 .

[32]  Mike Stieff,et al.  When is a molecule three dimensional? A task-specific role for imagistic reasoning in advanced chemistry† , 2011 .

[33]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  How instruction guides attention in multimedia learning , 2004 .

[34]  J. D. Bradley,et al.  Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection , 1991 .

[35]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Students' Misconceptions in Electrochemistry Regarding Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and the Salt Bridge , 1997 .

[36]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[37]  Tina Seufert Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[38]  Robert D. Allendoerfer,et al.  Teaching the Shapes of the Hydrogenlike and Hybrid Atomic Orbitals. , 1990 .

[39]  Michelle Cook Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles , 2006 .

[40]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Mental Models : The Role of Representations in Problem Solving in Chemistry PROCEEDINGS , 2002 .

[41]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Alternative Strategies for Spatial Reasoning with Diagrams , 2010, Diagrams.