The development of organized visual search.

Visual search plays an important role in guiding behavior. Children have more difficulty performing conjunction search tasks than adults. The present research evaluates whether developmental differences in children's ability to organize serial visual search (i.e., search organization skills) contribute to performance limitations in a typical conjunction search task. We evaluated 134 children between the ages of 2 and 17 on separate tasks measuring search for targets defined by a conjunction of features or by distinct features. Our results demonstrated that children organize their visual search better as they get older. As children's skills at organizing visual search improve they become more accurate at locating targets with conjunction of features amongst distractors, but not for targets with distinct features. Developmental limitations in children's abilities to organize their visual search of the environment are an important component of poor conjunction search in young children. In addition, our findings provide preliminary evidence that, like other visuospatial tasks, exposure to reading may influence children's spatial orientation to the visual environment when performing a visual search.

[1]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Inhibitory Control and the Frontal Eye Fields , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Massaro,et al.  Before you see it, you see its parts: Evidence for feature encoding and integration in preschool children and adults , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Rebecca Elliott,et al.  Executive functions and their disorders. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[5]  Britt Anderson,et al.  Spatial Probability Aids Visual Stimulus Discrimination , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  The development of visual search in infants and very young children. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  A. Toga,et al.  Mapping Continued Brain Growth and Gray Matter Density Reduction in Dorsal Frontal Cortex: Inverse Relationships during Postadolescent Brain Maturation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Opfer,et al.  How Numbers Bias Preschoolers’ Spatial Search , 2011 .

[9]  J. Enns,et al.  LIFESPAN CHANGES IN ATTENTION: THE VISUAL SEARCH TASK , 1998 .

[10]  B. Gibson,et al.  Surprise! An Unexpected Color Singleton Does Not Capture Attention in Visual Search , 1998 .

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[13]  P. Kochunov,et al.  Processing Speed Mediates the Development of General Intelligence (g) in Adolescence , 2011, Psychological science.

[14]  I. Deary,et al.  Reaction Time, Age, and Cognitive Ability: Longitudinal Findings from Age 16 to 63 Years in Representative Population Samples , 2005 .

[15]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Adam J Woods,et al.  Convergent validity of executive organization measures on cancellation , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[17]  J. Sorensen,et al.  Validation of reaction time as a measure of cognitive function and quality of life in healthy subjects and patients. , 2011, Nutrition.

[18]  J. Giedd Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Adolescent Brain , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Neural origin of cognitive shifting in young children , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  N Donnelly,et al.  Developing algorithms to enhance the sensitivity of cancellation tests of visuospatial neglect , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  David A. Boas,et al.  Frontal Lobe Activation during Object Permanence: Data from Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Giedd,et al.  Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  Paul W. Burgess,et al.  The Development of an Ecologically Valid Test for Assessing Patients with a Dysexecutive Syndrome , 1998 .

[24]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Visual Search Does Not Remain Efficient When Executive Working Memory Is Working , 2004, Psychological science.

[25]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual Search Demands Dictate Reliance upon Working Memory Storage , 2011 .

[26]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[27]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[28]  Shintaro Funahashi,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[29]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Visual hemispatial inattention: stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[30]  Ranjan Duara,et al.  Semantic interference deficits and the detection of mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment without dementia , 2004, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[31]  K. Cave,et al.  Visual search in children and adults: Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  K. Andersen,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF SIMPLE ACOUSTIC REACTION TIME IN NORMAL CHILDREN , 1984, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[33]  Pieter Reitsma,et al.  Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[34]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Early development of spatial-numeric associations: evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. , 2010, Developmental science.

[35]  Reaction-Times of Children , 1934 .

[36]  L. Robertson,et al.  Visual search and spatial deficits , 2006 .

[37]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Search has Memory , 2001, Psychological science.

[39]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Feature-Based Attention in the Frontal Eye Field and Area V4 during Visual Search , 2011, Neuron.

[40]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features , 2000, Vision Research.

[41]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Illusory Conjunctions of Color and Motion With Shape Following Bilateral Parietal Lesions , 1998 .

[43]  L. Robertson Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Stephen M. Emrich,et al.  Visual Search Elicits the Electrophysiological Marker of Visual Working Memory , 2009, PloS one.

[46]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .

[47]  J. McCarley,et al.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  S. Chokron,et al.  Reading habits and line bisection: a developmental approach. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  M Mennemeier,et al.  Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect , 2004, Neurology.

[50]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches , 2006, Vision Research.

[52]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Comparison of human infants and rhesus monkeys on Piaget's AB task: evidence for dependence on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.