Verb Biases Are Shaped Through Lifelong Learning

Verbs often participate in more than 1 syntactic structure, but individual verbs can be biased in terms of whether they are used more often with 1 structure or the other. For instance, in a sentence such as “Bop the bunny with the flower,” the phrase “with the flower” is more likely to indicate an instrument with which to “bop,” rather than which “bunny” to bop. Conversely, in a sentence such as “Choose the cow with the flower,” the phrase “with the flower” is more likely to indicate which “cow” to choose. An open question is where these biases come from and whether they continue to be shaped in adulthood in a way that has lasting consequences for real-time processing of language. In Experiment 1 we replicated previous findings that these language-wide biases guide online syntactic processing in a computer-based visual-world paradigm. In Experiment 2, we tested the malleability of these biases by exposing adults to initially unbiased verbs situated in unambiguous contexts that led to either instrument or modifier interpretations. During test, participants interpreted sentences containing either modifier- or instrument-trained verbs in ambiguous contexts. Eye-movement and action data show that participants’ considerations of the candidate interpretations of the ambiguous with-phrases were guided by the newly learned verb biases. These results suggest that co-occurrence information about specific verbs and syntactic structures embedded in language experiences plays a role in forming, and continuously shaping, the verb biases that constitute a part of the broader representation of the language.

[1]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected]. , 1994, Psychological review.

[2]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[4]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[5]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Evidence for priming across intervening sentences during on-line sentence comprehension , 2014, Language and cognitive processes.

[6]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  On the semantic content of subcategorization frames , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Verb Sense and Verb Subcategorization Probabilities , 2001 .

[8]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Long and short term cumulative structural priming effects , 2014, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[10]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[12]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences , 2003 .

[13]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Ting Qian,et al.  Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Dave F. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. , 2015, Psychological review.

[17]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? , 2010, Cognition.

[18]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[19]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Memory for Syntax Despite Amnesia , 2008, Psychological science.

[21]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[22]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[23]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Syntactic Priming Effects in Comprehension: A Critical Review , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[24]  Julie E. Boland The Relationship Between Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Sentence Comprehension. , 1997 .

[25]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Why It Is Hard to Label Our Concepts. , 2004 .

[26]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  J. Snedeker,et al.  On the plasticity of semantic generalizations: children and adults modify their verb lexicalization biases in response to changing input. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[28]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension , 2005 .

[29]  J. Trueswell THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[30]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[31]  Sylvia Yuan,et al.  Where does Verb Bias Come From ? Experience with Particular Verbs Affects Online Sentence Processing , 2011 .

[32]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  C. Fisher Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  L. Gleitman The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings , 2020, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.

[35]  Christina S. Kim,et al.  Syntactic Priming without Lexical Overlap in Reading Comprehension , 2014, Language and speech.

[36]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  The Wind Chilled the Spectators, but the Wine Just Chilled: Sense, Structure, and Sentence Comprehension , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[38]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1991 .

[40]  O. Mimura [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[41]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[42]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[43]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Constituent Attachment and Thematic Role Assignment in Sentence Processing: Influences of Content-Based Expectations , 1988 .

[44]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .

[45]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  Matthew J Traxler,et al.  Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Alex B. Fine,et al.  Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[50]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  This construction needs learned. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  M. Traxler,et al.  Syntactic Priming in Comprehension , 2007, Psychological science.

[53]  Sylvia Yuan,et al.  Syntactic bootstrapping. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[54]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.