Spreading on and penetration into thin, permeable print media: application to ink-jet printing.

This paper examines spreading and penetration of surfactant-laden drops on thin-permeable media with reference to ink-jet printing. A detailed review of the interaction of both pure liquids and surfactant containing solutions with porous substrates is given for individual spreading and penetration and for the combined processes. A new model based on energy arguments is derived and compared to current hydrodynamic equations used to describe simultaneous spreading and penetration. Three studies of how surfactant solutions interact with thin commercial ink-jet photographic quality papers are presented. Here, two relevant systems are examined: Tergitol 15-S-5 and 1,2-octanediol. The first study examines the spreading and penetration profiles for surfactant solutions over a range of concentrations spanning their critical micelle concentration. As expected, these profiles depend on the concentration of surfactant and the chemistry of the medium with which it interacts. In many cases, partial vertical penetration of the region directly beneath the drop dominates at low interaction times and will be significant in ink-jet applications. The second study consists of a parametric investigation of the energy-based model derived herein. It shows that the model can capture all of the behaviors observed in the first study. In the final study, the ability of the energy-based model to fully predict the spreading behavior of Tergitol 15-S-5 solutions is tested. It is found that the model produces good quantitative agreement at the highest concentrations and, as such, will be useful in screening spreading dynamics concentrated systems like ink-jet inks. Agreement at low to intermediate concentrations is often limited by finite induction periods prior to significant spreading and penetration. Possible corrections that could improve the agreement for weakly concentrated solutions are discussed, and directions for future studies of simultaneous spreading and penetration are proposed.

[1]  D. Uhlmann,et al.  Dynamics of Incomplete Wetting on Porous Materials , 1994 .

[2]  A. Clarke,et al.  Spreading and Imbibition of Liquid Droplets on Porous Surfaces , 2002 .

[3]  T. Svitova,et al.  Trisiloxane Surfactants: Surface/Interfacial Tension Dynamics and Spreading on Hydrophobic Surfaces , 1996 .

[4]  G. Garnier,et al.  Mechanism of Wetting and Absorption of Water Droplets on Sized Paper: Effects of Chemical and Physical Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[5]  J. Berg,et al.  The effect of surfactants on wicking flow in fiber networks , 1988 .

[6]  L. Scriven,et al.  Superspreading of water—silicone surfactant on hydrophobic surfaces , 1994 .

[7]  Françoise Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Dynamics of partial wetting , 1992 .

[8]  M. Ward,et al.  Superspreading of Aqueous Films Containing Trisiloxane Surfactant on Mineral Oil , 1997 .

[9]  N. Alleborn,et al.  Spreading and sorption of a droplet on a porous substrate , 2004 .

[10]  Victor Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over dry surfaces , 1994 .

[11]  Richard Lucas,et al.  Ueber das Zeitgesetz des kapillaren Aufstiegs von Flüssigkeiten , 1918 .

[12]  H. Davis,et al.  Enhanced Spreading of Aqueous Films Containing Ethoxylated Alcohol Surfactants on Solid Substrates , 1997 .

[13]  Z. Zorin,et al.  Penetration of aqueous surfactant solutions into thin hydrophobized capillaries , 1995 .

[14]  V. Starov,et al.  Capillary imbibition of surfactant solutions in porous media and thin capillaries: partial wetting case. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  F. Tiberg,et al.  Spreading dynamics of liquids and surfactant solutions on partially wettable hydrophobic substrates , 2001 .

[16]  V. Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over saturated porous layers. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  F. Tiberg,et al.  Spreading Dynamics of Surfactant Solutions , 1999 .

[18]  R. Hill.  Superspreading : Thermodynamic and theoretical aspects , 1998 .

[19]  V M Starov,et al.  Spreading of aqueous SDS solutions over nitrocellulose membranes. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[20]  P. Gennes.  Wetting: statics and dynamics , 1985 .

[21]  J. B. Riggs.  An Introduction to Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineers , 1988 .

[22]  V. Starov,et al.  Spreading of liquid drops over dry porous layers: complete wetting case. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[23]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Liquid drop spreading on solid surfaces at low impact speeds , 2000 .

[24]  J. Heilmann,et al.  Significance of paper properties on print quality in continuous ink jet printing , 2000 .

[25]  N. Alleborn,et al.  Spreading and sorption of droplets on layered porous substrates. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[26]  Dewetting on porous media with aspiration , 1999, cond-mat/9909416.

[27]  Jali Heilmann,et al.  Effect of Drop Size on the Print Quality in Continuous Ink Jet Printing , 2000, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology.

[28]  M. Ward,et al.  Determination of wetting velocities of surfactant superspreaders with the quartz crystal microbalance , 1994 .

[29]  F. Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Droplet suction on porous media , 2000 .

[30]  K. Ananthapadmanabhan,et al.  A study of the solution, interfacial and wetting properties of silicone surfactants , 1990 .

[31]  France.,et al.  Droplet Spreading: Partial Wetting Regime Revisited , 1998, cond-mat/9810040.

[32]  E. W. Washburn.  The Dynamics of Capillary Flow , 1921 .

[33]  Joël De Coninck,et al.  Experimental Evidence of Several Time Scales in Drop Spreading , 2000 .

[34]  Dongqing Li,et al.  A model for a liquid drop spreading on a solid surface , 1998 .

[35]  Zhmud,et al.  Dynamics of Capillary Rise. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[36]  F. Tiberg,et al.  Capillary rise of surfactant solutions , 2000 .