Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson's disease

Introduction & objectives Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) uses feedback from brain signals to guide stimulation. A recent acute trial of unilateral aDBS showed that aDBS can lead to substantial improvements in contralateral hemibody Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores and may be superior to conventional continuous DBS in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We test whether potential benefits are retained with bilateral aDBS and in the face of concurrent medication. Methods We applied bilateral aDBS in 4 patients with PD undergoing DBS of the subthalamic nucleus. aDBS was delivered bilaterally with independent triggering of stimulation according to the amplitude of β activity at the corresponding electrode. Mean stimulation voltage was 3.0±0.1 volts. Motor assessments consisted of double-blinded video-taped motor UPDRS scores that included both limb and axial features. Results UPDRS scores were 43% (p=0.04; Cohen’s d=1.62) better with aDBS than without stimulation. Motor improvement with aDBS occurred despite an average time on stimulation (ToS) of only 45%. Levodopa was well tolerated during aDBS and led to further reductions in ToS. Conclusion Bilateral aDBS can improve both axial and limb symptoms and can track the need for stimulation across drug states.

[1]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Assessment of Fine Motor Control in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease Using Force Tracking with a Secondary Cognitive Task , 2010, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[2]  Alberto Priori,et al.  Subthalamic local field potentials after seven-year deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2012, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  J. Laczko,et al.  The time course of the return of upper limb bradykinesia after cessation of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. , 2007, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[4]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Thomas Foltynie,et al.  Surgical management of Parkinson’s disease , 2010, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[6]  F. Benedetti,et al.  Temporal Changes in Movement Time during the Switch of the Stimulators in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Treated by Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation , 2003, European Neurology.

[7]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Time dependent subthalamic local field potential changes after DBS surgery in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  P. Brown,et al.  Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation In Advanced Parkinson Disease , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[9]  A. Lang,et al.  Ten-year outcome of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a blinded evaluation. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[10]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Beta oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus and its relation to dopaminergic response in Parkinson's disease. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  S. Haber,et al.  Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Is Superior in Ameliorating Parkinsonism , 2011, Neuron.

[12]  Jaimie M. Henderson,et al.  Bilateral symmetry and coherence of subthalamic nuclei beta band activity in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  Hayriye Cagnan,et al.  Does suppression of oscillatory synchronisation mediate some of the therapeutic effects of DBS in patients with Parkinson's disease? , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[14]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Andrea A. Kühn,et al.  Pathological synchronisation in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson's disease relates to both bradykinesia and rigidity , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[16]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Return of bradykinesia after subthalamic stimulation ceases: Relationship to electrode location , 2011, Experimental Neurology.

[17]  Peter Brown,et al.  Bilateral Functional Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease and Its Modulation by Dopaminergic Treatment , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  R. Goodman,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease: blinded assessments at one year follow up , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[19]  John-Stuart Brittain,et al.  The highs and lows of beta activity in cortico-basal ganglia loops , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  W. A. Taylor Change-Point Analysis : A Powerful New Tool For Detecting Changes , 2000 .

[21]  Nicola J. Ray,et al.  Local field potential beta activity in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with improvements in bradykinesia after dopamine and deep brain stimulation , 2008, Experimental Neurology.

[22]  G. Deuschl,et al.  A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Peter Brown,et al.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: A two-edged sword , 2006, Current Biology.

[24]  N. Ince,et al.  Long-term recordings of local field potentials from implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[25]  P. Brown,et al.  Reduction in subthalamic 8–35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson's disease , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Günther Deuschl,et al.  Clinical outcome of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[27]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.