Transmission-less attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET: analysis of a discrete iterative algorithm

The maximum likelihood attenuation correction factors (MLACF) algorithm has been developed to calculate the maximum-likelihood estimate of the activity image and the attenuation sinogram in time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography, using only emission data without prior information on the attenuation. We consider the case of a Poisson model of the data, in the absence of scatter or random background. In this case the maximization with respect to the attenuation factors can be achieved in a closed form and the MLACF algorithm works by updating the activity. Despite promising numerical results, the convergence of this algorithm has not been analysed. In this paper we derive the algorithm and demonstrate that the MLACF algorithm monotonically increases the likelihood, is asymptotically regular, and that the limit points of the iteration are stationary points of the likelihood. Because the problem is not convex, however, the limit points might be saddle points or local maxima. To obtain some empirical insight into the latter question, we present data obtained by applying MLACF to 2D simulated TOF data, using a large number of iterations and different initializations.

[1]  David Brasse,et al.  An analytic study of the effects of attenuation on tumor detection in whole-body PET oncology imaging. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Reconstruction of uniform sensitivity emission image with partially known axial attenuation information in PET-CT scanners , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[3]  Rolf Clackdoyle,et al.  Attenuation correction in PET using consistency information , 1998 .

[4]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML-reconstruction for TOF-PET with simultaneous estimation of the attenuation factors , 2014, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[5]  Y. Censor,et al.  A New Approach to the Emission Computerized Tomography Problem: Simultaneous Calculation of Attenuation and Activity Coefficients , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Til Aach,et al.  Iterative generation of attenuation maps in TOF-PET/MR using consistency conditions , 2009 .

[7]  M. Conti Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  V. Schulz,et al.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[9]  James E. Bowsher,et al.  An EM algorithm for estimating SPECT emission and transmission parameters from emission data only , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET-MR brain imaging systems using deformable image registration. , 2010, Medical physics.

[11]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Joint estimation of attenuation and emission images from PET scans , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[12]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  Activity and attenuation recovery from activity data only in emission computed tomography , 2006 .

[13]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  H. Herzog,et al.  Attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1992 .

[15]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation in Time-of-Flight PET , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Sangtae Ahn,et al.  Convergent iterative algorithms for joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation from time-of-flight PET data , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[17]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Ilja Bezrukov,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Continuous and Discrete Data Rebinning in Time-of-Flight PET , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Bruno De Man,et al.  Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Steven R. Meikle,et al.  Quantitative Techniques in PET , 2005 .

[22]  Stefaan Vandenberghe,et al.  Fast reconstruction of 3D time-of-flight PET data by axial rebinning and transverse mashing , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Exact and approximate Fourier rebinning of PET data from time-of-flight to non time-of-flight , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[26]  A. V. Bronnikov,et al.  Reconstruction of attenuation map using discrete consistency conditions , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Direct MAP estimation of attenuation sinogram using TOF PET emission data , 2013 .

[28]  G Glatting,et al.  Simultaneous iterative reconstruction for emission and attenuation images in positron emission tomography. , 2000, Medical physics.

[29]  Timothy G. Turkington,et al.  Attenuation artifacts and time-of-flight PET , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[30]  J. Fessler,et al.  Joint maximum likelihood estimation of emission and attenuation densities in PET , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[31]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. , 2011, Medical physics.

[33]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1998 .

[34]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML-Reconstruction for TOF-PET With Simultaneous Estimation of the Attenuation Factors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  CT-based attenuation correction for PET/CT scanners in the presence of contrast agent , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[36]  D. Hunter,et al.  Optimization Transfer Using Surrogate Objective Functions , 2000 .

[37]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[39]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.