The empirical study of figurative language in literature

Abstract This article addresses the study of figurative language in literary texts. The psychological research on eight forms of figurative language is reviewed. The majority of this research has utilized short artificial texts which may not reflect the psychological processes involved in comprehending figurative language in longer, more literary texts. Other limitations of figurative language research include: (1) a bias towards metaphor research at the expense of other common forms of figurative language; (2) insufficient examination of how authorial intent, genre, and reader knowledge can affect figurative language comprehension; (3) a bias towards research on comprehension at the expense of production; and (4) insufficient understanding of how discourse goals can be fulfilled by figurative language. It is suggested that attention to these four issues could greatly improve our understanding of figurative language in ecologically valid contexts.

[1]  P. Gildea,et al.  On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? , 1982 .

[2]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[3]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Aspects of idiom interpretation: Comment on Nayak and Gibbs , 1991 .

[4]  J. L. Myers,et al.  The role of context in metaphor comprehension , 1987 .

[5]  B. Ackerman Young Children's Understanding of a Speaker's Intentional Use of a False Utterance , 1981 .

[6]  Richard J. Vondruska,et al.  Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity , 1985 .

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Wit and humor in discourse processing , 1988 .

[8]  R. M. Billow Metaphor: A review of the psychological literature. , 1977 .

[9]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors work , 1993 .

[10]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Metaphors in Conversation: How Are They Understood? Why Are They Used? , 1989 .

[11]  T. Eagleton,et al.  Literary Theory: An Introduction. , 1984 .

[12]  S. Kemper,et al.  What could reaction-time studies be telling us about metaphor comprehension? , 1987 .

[13]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[14]  R. Beaugrande,et al.  Foundation for the empirical study of literature : the components of a basic theory , 1982 .

[15]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Metaphor, Idiom, and Figuration , 1989 .

[16]  H. Pollio,et al.  Metaphor as intellectual history: conceptual categories underlying figurative usage in American English from 1675-1975 , 1981 .

[17]  R. Gibbs THE PROCESS OF UNDERSTANDING LITERARY METAPHOR , 1990 .

[18]  Roger J. Kreuz,et al.  On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications , 1991 .

[19]  Mary K. Camac,et al.  Metaphors do not use associations between concepts, they are used to create them , 1984 .

[20]  R. Gibbs Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests , 1983 .

[21]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[22]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Understanding and appreciating metaphors , 1982, Cognition.

[23]  Daniel J. Howard Rhetorical question effects on message processing and persuasion: The role of information availability and the elicitation of judgment , 1990 .

[24]  R. Beaugrande Toward the empirical study of literature: A synoptic sketch of a new ‘society’ , 1989 .

[25]  U. Neisser Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[26]  Judith A. Arter,et al.  Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research , 1978 .

[27]  D. Rumelhart Metaphor and Thought: Some problems with the notion of literal meanings , 1993 .

[28]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Beyond the Lexicon: Creativity in Language Production , 1988 .

[29]  D. Boswell Speakers' Intentions: Constraints on Metaphor Comprehension , 1986 .

[30]  Raymond Cohen,et al.  Problems of intercultural communication in Egyptian-American diplomatic relations , 1987 .

[31]  H. H. Clark,et al.  How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance , 1985 .

[32]  Samuel A. Bobrow,et al.  On catching on to idiomatic expressions , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Why idioms mean what they do , 1991 .

[34]  R. Gibbs On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. , 1986 .

[35]  M. Black More about metaphor , 1977 .

[36]  P. Gildea,et al.  On understanding metaphor: the role of context , 1983 .

[37]  Dennis L. Micham Memory for irony in prose , 1984 .

[38]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity. , 1990 .

[39]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special' , 1989 .

[40]  Russell A. Hunt,et al.  Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading , 1984 .

[41]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Psychological aspects of irony understanding , 1991 .

[42]  Richard P. Honeck Verbal Materials in Research on Figurative Language , 1986 .

[43]  Axel Hübler,et al.  Understatements and Hedges in English , 1983 .

[44]  R. Gibbs Comprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests ☆ , 1986 .

[45]  RAYMOND W. GIBBS,et al.  Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Ellen Winner,et al.  The Point Of Words: Children's Understanding Of Metaphor And Irony , 1990 .

[47]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Naturalistic Text Comprehension , 1994 .

[49]  Anne Cutler Idioms: The colder the older , 1982 .

[50]  Michael K. Smith,et al.  Need metaphoric comprehension take longer than literal comprehension? , 1984 .

[51]  P. Wiener,et al.  Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. , 1973 .

[52]  R. Gibbs Your Wish Is My Command; Convention and Context in Interpreting Indirect Requests. , 1981 .

[53]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms , 1985, Cognition.

[54]  G. Steen Metaphor and literary comprehension: Towards a discourse theory of metaphor in literature , 1989 .

[55]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[56]  Jens B. Asendorpf,et al.  Self-Reported Expression of Embarrassment in Five European Cultures , 1989 .

[57]  Rolf A. Zwaan Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation , 1991 .

[58]  Gibbs,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: Process and products in making sense of tropes , 1993 .

[59]  H. H. Clark Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  Howard R. Pollio,et al.  Figurative language and cognitive psychology , 1990 .

[61]  Richard Boyd Metaphor and Thought: Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? , 1993 .

[62]  Raymond W. Gibbs Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation∗ , 1986 .

[63]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[64]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests , 1979 .

[65]  R. Gibbs Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[66]  George A. Miller,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: Images and models, similes and metaphors , 1993 .

[67]  R. Kreuz,et al.  On Satire and Parody: The Importance of Being Ironic , 1993 .

[68]  Factors affecting the interpretation of figurative language uses , 1986 .

[69]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[70]  B. Ackerman,et al.  Form and function in children's understanding of ironic utterances☆ , 1983 .

[71]  H. Gardner,et al.  Art, Mind, And Brain: A Cognitive Approach To Creativity , 1984 .

[72]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text , 1991 .

[73]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Interpreting and evaluating metaphors , 1991 .

[74]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Authorial intentions and metaphor comprehension , 1991, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[75]  A. Healy,et al.  Dual processes in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. , 1983 .

[76]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms: Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93. , 1978 .

[77]  B. Keysar On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. , 1989 .

[78]  M. Heesacker,et al.  Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. , 1981 .