Technoscience, Anaerobic Digester Technology and the Dairy Industry

Structural change in the US dairy industry toward fewer and very large farms has fueled interest and government funding of research into the feasibility of constructing anaerobic digesters (ADs) on large operations as a waste management strategy. Some groups opposed to increasing scale and concentration in the livestock sectors, including dairy, also oppose ADs because of the connection with larger scale operations and the potential for facilitating increased concentration in agricultural production. But the connection between AD technology and large scale is a social construction promoted by its incorporation into the debates over agricultural industrialization. The technology per se is essentially scale neutral and its scale-implications are artifacts of design choices, as is seen by its successful application to both very small farms around the world and large-scale agricultural enterprises in the USA. Using a survey of dairy farmers in New York, we find that interest in AD technology occurs at all farm sizes; and that factors other than farm size are important in determining interest in the technology. We conclude that the technoscientific question raised by these findings is: will applications to, and interest by, smaller dairy farmer operators result in shifts in policy and funding priorities toward more diverse agricultural research agendas regarding AD technology?

[1]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[2]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[3]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[4]  A. J. Grimes Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies , 1985 .

[5]  G. Berardi Changing the Way America Farms: Knowledge and Community in the Sustainable Agriculture Movement , 2002 .

[6]  R. Kellogg,et al.  Manure Nutrients Relative to The Capacity Of Cropland And Pastureland To Assimilate Nutrients: Spatial and Temporal Trends for the United States , 2000 .

[7]  Jack Kloppenburg Social Theory and the De/Reconstruction of Agricultural Science: Local Knowledge for an Alternative Agriculture1 , 2010 .

[8]  S. Sismondo An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies , 2003 .

[9]  R. Welsh,et al.  The effects of the industrialization of US livestock agriculture on promoting sustainable production practices , 2003 .

[10]  Thorolfur Thorlindsson Skipper science: a note on the epistemology of practice and the nature of expertise , 1994 .

[11]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[12]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[13]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[14]  E. Rogers Social Change in Rural Societies , 1988 .

[15]  R. Welsh,et al.  Feminist Knowledge Claims, Local Knowledge, and Gender Divisions of Agricultural Labor: Constructing a Successor Science. , 2010 .

[16]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .