Interinstitutional review of thyroid fine‐needle aspirations: Impact on clinical management of thyroid nodules

Routine interinstitution pathology consultation can result in change in pathologic diagnosis in up to 10% of patients. In this study, we compared the outside cytopathologic diagnosis of thyroid fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) specimens with the in‐house diagnosis at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center over an 18‐mo period and its effect on patient management. One hundred ten (60%) diagnostic disagreements were identified among 183 patients. In 16 cases, the diagnosis was changed from benign to malignant, and in 12, the diagnosis was reversed from neoplastic/malignant to benign. Histologic follow‐up was available in 109 cases; the overall accuracy of outside diagnosis was 73%, and that of inside diagnosis was 85%. In conclusion, we strongly recommend interinstitution cytology consultation on referred thyroid FNA cases, since our data showed a significant change in diagnosis, thus affecting patient management. Diagn. Cytopathol. 25:231–234, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Epstein,et al.  Consensus conference on second opinions in diagnostic anatomic pathology. Who, What, and When. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  L. Layfield,et al.  Prevalence of inter-institutional anatomic pathology slide review: a survey of current practice. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[3]  J. Epstein,et al.  Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital , 1999, Cancer.

[4]  V. Livolsi,et al.  Mandatory second opinion of pathologic slides , 1999, Cancer.

[5]  Bosman Ft,et al.  [Quality management in histopathology. "From biopsy to diagnosis"]. , 1999 .

[6]  A. Selman,et al.  Quality assurance of second opinion pathology in gynecologic oncology. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  D. Gershenson,et al.  The current status of surgical staging of ovarian serous borderline tumors , 1999, Cancer.

[8]  M. Sack,et al.  Follicular variant of papillary carcinoma. Cytologic and histologic correlation. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  G. Fuller,et al.  Diagnostic discrepancies and their clinical impact in a neuropathology referral practice , 1997, Cancer.

[10]  A. Ackerman,et al.  Discordance among expert pathologists in diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms. , 1996, Human pathology.

[11]  P. Walsh,et al.  Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology. Review of prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  A. Abt,et al.  The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  P. Boiko,et al.  Reliability Of Skin Biopsy Pathology , 1994, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[14]  Bogomoletz Wv [Consultation in pathology. The pathologist's view point]. , 1994 .

[15]  M. Husain,et al.  Semiquantitative criteria for fine‐needle biopsy diagnosis: Reduced false‐negative diagnoses , 1988, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[16]  H. Gharib,et al.  Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid, 1980 to 1986. , 1987, Acta cytologica.