Subjective Test Dataset and Meta-data-based Models for 360° Streaming Video Quality

During the last years, the number of 360° videos available for streaming has rapidly increased, leading to the need for 360° streaming video quality assessment. In this paper, we report and publish results of three subjective 360° video quality tests, with conditions used to reflect real-world bitrates and resolutions including 4K, 6K and 8K, resulting in 64 stimuli each for the first two tests and 63 for the third. As playout device we used the HTC Vive for the first and HTC Vive Pro for the remaining two tests. Video-quality ratings were collected using the 5-point Absolute Category Rating scale. The 360° dataset provided with the paper contains the links of the used source videos, the raw subjective scores, video-related meta-data, head rotation data and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire results per stimulus and per subject to enable reproducibility of the provided results. Moreover, we use our dataset to compare the performance of state-of-the-art full-reference quality metrics such as VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, ADM2, WS-PSNR and WS-SSIM. Out of all metrics, VMAF was found to show the highest correlation with the subjective scores. Further, we evaluated a center-cropped version of VMAF ("VMAF-cc") that showed to provide a similar performance as the full VMAF. In addition to the dataset and the objective metric evaluation, we propose two new video-quality prediction models, a bitstream meta-data-based model and a hybrid no-reference model using bitrate, resolution and pixel information of the video as input. The new lightweight models provide similar performance as the full-reference models while enabling fast calculations.

[1]  Roberto Gerson De Albuquerque Azevedo,et al.  A Viewport-Driven Multi-Metric Fusion Approach for 360-Degree Video Quality Assessment , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME).

[2]  R. W. Jones The International Telecommunication Union , 1997 .

[3]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Werner Robitza,et al.  Bitstream-Based Model Standard for 4K/UHD: ITU-T P.1204.3 — Model Details, Evaluation, Analysis and Open Source Implementation , 2020, 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[5]  Christian Timmerer,et al.  Tile-based Streaming of 8K Omnidirectional Video: Subjective and Objective QoE Evaluation , 2019, 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[6]  Alexander Raake,et al.  cencro - Speedup of Video Quality Calculation using Center Cropping , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM).

[7]  Antoine Coutrot,et al.  A dataset of head and eye movements for 360° videos , 2018, MMSys.

[8]  Cheng-Hsin Hsu,et al.  360° Video Viewing Dataset in Head-Mounted Virtual Reality , 2017, MMSys.

[9]  Methods , metrics and procedures for statistical evaluation , qualification and comparison of objective quality prediction models , 2013 .

[10]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[11]  Tobias Hoßfeld,et al.  SOS: The MOS is not enough! , 2011, 2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[12]  Ashutosh Singla,et al.  AVtrack360: an open dataset and software recording people's head rotations watching 360° videos on an HMD , 2018, MMSys.

[13]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[14]  Narciso García,et al.  Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) on 360VR Contents , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[15]  Cagri Ozcinar,et al.  Visual Attention-Aware Omnidirectional Video Streaming Using Optimal Tiles for Virtual Reality , 2019, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[16]  Julián Cabrera,et al.  Voronoi-based Objective Quality Metrics for Omnidirectional Video , 2019, 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[17]  Soren Forchhammer,et al.  Towards a Perceived Audiovisual Quality Model for Immersive Content , 2020, 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[18]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[19]  Shahid M. Satti,et al.  P.1203 evaluation of real OTT video services , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[20]  Alexander Raake,et al.  A bitstream-based, scalable video-quality model for HTTP adaptive streaming: ITU-T P.1203.1 , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[21]  Lu Yu,et al.  Weighted-to-Spherically-Uniform Quality Evaluation for Omnidirectional Video , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[22]  Zulin Wang,et al.  Assessing Visual Quality of Omnidirectional Videos , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[23]  Chen Li,et al.  Bridge the Gap Between VQA and Human Behavior on Omnidirectional Video: A Large-Scale Dataset and a Deep Learning Model , 2018, ACM Multimedia.

[24]  Alexander Raake,et al.  HTTP adaptive streaming QoE estimation with ITU-T rec. P. 1203: open databases and software , 2018, MMSys.

[25]  Cagri Ozcinar,et al.  Super-resolution of Omnidirectional Images Using Adversarial Learning , 2019, 2019 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP).

[26]  Gwendal Simon,et al.  360-Degree Video Head Movement Dataset , 2017, MMSys.

[27]  Xiaoming Tao,et al.  Viewport Proposal CNN for 360° Video Quality Assessment , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).