Using Spatial Methods in Strategy Research

Spatial and geographic constructs have been incorporated into strategy research since its inception. Yet, strategy researchers have been slow to take advantage of methods designed specifically for these variables. This is despite the fact that spatial methods can be used to identify and remediate spatial autocorrelation—eliminating a potentially important source of bias in empirical results—and more broadly, to test hypotheses about spatial phenomena in novel ways. This article reviews the use of spatial constructs and variables in strategy research, summarizes spatial methods relevant to the strategy field, and shows how these approaches can enhance strategy research. The authors demonstrate the utility of these methods for a wide range of empirical inquiries into the role of geographic space in firm location, competition, and other phenomena, and offer three specific illustrations of their usefulness in the context of international strategy research.

[1]  L. Anselin Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[2]  J. Ord,et al.  Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application , 2010 .

[3]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Spatial Statistics , 2013 .

[4]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[5]  Jonathan P. Doh,et al.  Using Bayesian methods in strategy research: an extension of Hansenet al. , 2006 .

[6]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[7]  Jedrzej George Frynas,et al.  First mover advantages in international business and firm‐specific political resources , 2006 .

[8]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Who Competes with Whom? A Demand-Based Perspective for Identifying and Representing Asymmetric Competition , 2006 .

[9]  A. Agrawal Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge , 2006 .

[10]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  Understanding Geographical Markets of Online Firms Using Spatial Models of Customer Choice , 2005 .

[11]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment , 2005 .

[12]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs' co-location decisions , 2005 .

[13]  Geoffrey G. Bell Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness , 2005 .

[14]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Spatial Statistics: Ripley/Spatial Statistics , 2005 .

[15]  Shige Makino,et al.  Does country matter , 2004 .

[16]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent , 2004 .

[17]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries , 2004 .

[19]  Wilbur Chung,et al.  Resource-Seeking Agglomeration: A Study of Market Entry in the Lodging Industry , 2004 .

[20]  Subramanian Rangan,et al.  EXPLAINING OUTCOMES IN COMPETITION AMONG FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS IN A FOCAL HOST MARKET , 2004 .

[21]  Magnus Ekström,et al.  Subsampling Methods to Estimate the Variance of Sample Means Based on Nonstationary Spatial Data With Varying Expected Values , 2004 .

[22]  Sergio J. Rey,et al.  Econometrics for Spatial Models: Recent Advances , 2004 .

[23]  L. Pil The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[24]  Sergio J. Rey,et al.  Advances in Spatial Econometrics , 2004 .

[25]  S. Hall,et al.  Leaders, Laggards and the Pursuit of Foreign Knowledge , 2004 .

[26]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  Liability of foreignness in global competition? financial service affiliates in the City of London , 2003 .

[27]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[28]  Robert Haining,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[29]  P. Diggle,et al.  A Non‐Gaussian Spatial Process Model for Opacity of Flocculated Paper , 2003 .

[30]  Michael V. Russo,et al.  The emergence of sustainable industries: building on natural capital , 2003 .

[31]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  Entry Mode, Organizational Learning and R&D in Foreign Affiliates: Evidence from japanese Firms , 2003 .

[32]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[33]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Growth Modeling Using Random Coefficient Models: Model Building, Testing, and Illustrations , 2002 .

[34]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Sequential Investment, Firm Motives, and Agglomeration of Japanese Electronics Firms in the United States , 2002 .

[35]  George I. Kassinis,et al.  Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation , 2002 .

[36]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Firm capabilities and technology ladders: sequential foreign direct investments of Japanese electronics firms in East Asia , 2002 .

[37]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[38]  J. W. Medcof Resource‐based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units , 2001 .

[39]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Market microstructure in a global B2B network , 2001 .

[40]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Unobserved Retailer Behavior in Multimarket Data: Joint Spatial Dependence in Market Shares and Promotion Variables , 2001 .

[41]  Tony S. Frost The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[42]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[43]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  Knowledge inventories and managerial myopia , 2000 .

[44]  D. Schendel,et al.  How do international joint ventures create shareholder value , 2000 .

[45]  O. Sorenson Letting the market work for you: an evolutionary perspective on product strategy , 2000 .

[46]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[47]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  Accounting for inaccuracies in population counts and case registration in cancer mapping studies , 1999 .

[48]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[49]  D. Hofmann An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[50]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[51]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF THE LIABILITY OF FOREIGNNESS: A GLOBAL STUDY OF SURVIVAL IN FINANCIAL SERVICES , 1997 .

[52]  Louis A. Thomas ADVERTISING SUNK COSTS AND CREDIBLE SPATIAL PREEMPTION , 1996 .

[53]  P. Longley,et al.  Spatial analysis: Modelling in a GIS environment , 1996 .

[54]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results , 1995 .

[55]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[56]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[57]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[58]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[59]  L. Anselin,et al.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[60]  D. Clayton,et al.  Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. , 1987, Biometrics.

[61]  Daniel A. Griffith Urban Dominance, Spatial Structure, and Spatial Dynamics: Some Theoretical Conjectures and Empirical Implications , 1979 .

[62]  D. Unwin,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Spatial Series , 1974 .

[63]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[64]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[65]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[66]  J. Jewkes,et al.  Theory of Location of Industries. , 1933 .

[67]  F. E. Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[68]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .