In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the geometric pattern and the intensity of artifacts around titanium implants in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten test models, each containing one 4.1-mm-diameter titanium implant, were cast from a human mandible using silicone impression material and dental stone. Each model contained an implant in one of the following single-tooth gaps: 37, 36, 34, 33, 31, 41, 43, 44, 46, and 47. For control purposes, three models without implants were produced. Each model was scanned five times using a CBCT scanner. Gray values (GV) were recorded at eight circumferential positions around the implants at 0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm from the implant surface (GVTest ). GV were measured in the corresponding volumes of interest (VOI) in the models without implants (GVControl ). Differences of gray values (ΔGV) between GVTest and GVControl were calculated as percentages. To detect differences between GVTest and GVControl , the 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed for the values of ΔGV. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for the comparison of ΔGV at 0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm from the implant surface. RESULTS Artifacts reflected by altered GV were always present in the proximity of titanium implants, regardless of the implant position. When comparing GVTest and GVControl , increased GV were found at the buccal and lingual aspects of the implant sites, whereas regions with reduced GV were located along the long axis of the mandibular body of the test models. A significant decrease in artifact intensity was found with increasing distance from the buccal implant surface (ΔGV0.5 mm : 45 ± 10% [SD], ΔGV1 mm : 28 ± 14% [SD], ΔGV2 mm : 14 ± 7% [SD]) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Artifacts around titanium implants in CBCT images were distributed according to a geometrical pattern.

[1]  Wim Teughels,et al.  Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  M. Ivanovic,et al.  Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[3]  S. Zhao,et al.  X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelets: an application for imaging total hip prostheses , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  G Zarb,et al.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. , 1986, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  U. Streubühr,et al.  Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[7]  T. Flemmig,et al.  Tissue augmentation and esthetics (Working Group 3). , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  S. Brooks,et al.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  C. Lascala,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  P. Herzog,et al.  Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. , 2007, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  Seyed Ahmad Fatemitabar,et al.  Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  Jonathan Davies,et al.  Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[15]  S. Patel,et al.  New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. , 2009, International endodontic journal.

[16]  D A Tyndall,et al.  Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  S. Richmond,et al.  Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  M. Ekram,et al.  A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze,et al.  On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  B. Kruse,et al.  Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  E. Seldin,et al.  Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  E. Whaites,et al.  New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. , 2009, International endodontic journal.

[23]  M Kortesniemi,et al.  Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.