How does it play better?: exploring user testing and biometric storyboards in games user research

Improving game design is a hard task. Few methods are available in games user research (GUR) to test formally how game designs work for players. In particular, the usefulness of user tests (UTs) for game designers has not been fully studied in the CHI community. We propose a novel GUR method called Biometric Storyboards (BioSt) and present a study demonstrating how a Classic UT and a BioSt UT both help designers create a better gameplay experience. In addition, we show that BioSt can help designers deliver significantly better visuals, more fun, and higher gameplay quality than designing without UTs and that classic UTs do not provide this significant advantage. Our interviews support the idea that BioSt provides more nuanced game design improvement. The design implication is that a game designed with the BioSt method will result in high gameplay quality.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[2]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[4]  Michael John,et al.  Data cracker: developing a visual game analytic tool for analyzing online gameplay , 2011, CHI.

[5]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Fundamentals of physiological computing , 2009, Interact. Comput..

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[7]  Dennis R. Wixon,et al.  Using the RITE method to improve products; a definition and a case study , 2007 .

[8]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Using Biometric Measurement to Help Develop Emotionally Compelling Games , 2008 .

[9]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  S. Puttonen,et al.  The psychophysiology of James Bond: phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. , 2008, Emotion.

[11]  Effie Lai-Chong Law,et al.  The measurability and predictability of user experience , 2011, EICS '11.

[12]  Günter Wallner,et al.  A spatiotemporal visualization approach for the analysis of gameplay data , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[14]  Georgios N. Yannakakis,et al.  Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games , 2010, Sandbox '10.

[15]  Pejman Mirza-Babaei,et al.  Understanding the Contribution of Biometrics to Games User Research , 2011, DiGRA Conference.

[16]  Randy J. Pagulayan,et al.  User-centered design in games , 2012 .

[17]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Biometric storyboards: visualising game user research data , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Guillaume Chanel,et al.  A review of the use of psychophysiological methods in game research , 2011 .

[19]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Affective Ludology, Flow and Immersion in a First- Person Shooter: Measurement of Player Experience , 2009, ArXiv.

[21]  N. Ravaja.  Contributions of Psychophysiology to Media Research: Review and Recommendations , 2004 .

[22]  Regina Bernhaupt,et al.  Evaluating User Experience in Games - Concepts and Methods , 2010, Human-Computer Interaction Series.