Compensation or Restoration: Closed-Loop Feedback of Movement Quality for Assisted Reach-to-Grasp Exercises with a Multi-Joint Arm Exoskeleton

Assistive technology allows for intensive practice and kinematic measurements during rehabilitation exercises. More recent approaches attach a gravity-compensating multi-joint exoskeleton to the upper extremity to facilitate task-oriented training in three-dimensional space with virtual reality feedback. The movement quality, however, is mostly captured through end-point measures that lack information on proximal inter-joint coordination. This limits the differentiation between compensation strategies and genuine restoration both during the exercise and in the course of rehabilitation. We extended in this proof-of-concept study a commercially available seven degree-of-freedom arm exoskeleton by using the real-time sensor data to display a three-dimensional multi-joint visualization of the user's arm. Ten healthy subjects and three severely affected chronic stroke patients performed reach-to-grasp exercises resembling activities of daily living assisted by the attached exoskeleton and received closed-loop online feedback of the three-dimensional movement in virtual reality. Patients in this pilot study differed significantly with regard to motor performance (accuracy, temporal efficiency, range of motion) and movement quality (proximal inter-joint coordination) from the healthy control group. In the course of 20 training and feedback sessions over 4 weeks, these pathological measures improved significantly toward the reference parameters of healthy participants. It was moreover feasible to capture the evolution of movement pattern kinematics of the shoulder and elbow and to quantify the individual degree of natural movement restoration for each patient. The virtual reality visualization and closed-loop feedback of joint-specific movement kinematics makes it possible to detect compensation strategies and may provide a tool to achieve the rehabilitation goals in accordance with the individual capacity for genuine functional restoration; a proposal that warrants further investigation in controlled studies with a larger cohort of stroke patients.

[1]  B. Wünsche,et al.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Reinforcement learning for adaptive threshold control of restorative brain-computer interfaces: a Bayesian simulation , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  M. Levin,et al.  Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Oscillatory entrainment of the motor cortical network during motor imagery is modulated by the feedback modality , 2015, NeuroImage.

[5]  香川 美仁,et al.  Effects of Robot Assisted Therapy , 2012 .

[6]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  Closed-Loop Neuroprosthesis for Reach-to-Grasp Assistance: Combining Adaptive Multi-channel Neuromuscular Stimulation with a Multi-joint Arm Exoskeleton , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[7]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  D. Gravel,et al.  Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Predicting workload profiles of brain–robot interface and electromygraphic neurofeedback with cortical resting-state networks: personal trait or task-specific challenge? , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Peter Stone,et al.  Reinforcement learning , 2019, Scholarpedia.

[11]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Validity of Movement Pattern Kinematics as Measures of Arm Motor Impairment Poststroke , 2010, Stroke.

[12]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  Self-regulation of circumscribed brain activity modulates spatially selective and frequency specific connectivity of distributed resting state networks , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[14]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Reinforcement learning of self-regulated sensorimotor β-oscillations improves motor performance , 2016, NeuroImage.

[15]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Lateralized alpha-band cortical networks regulate volitional modulation of beta-band sensorimotor oscillations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  Bernhard Elsner,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Brain State-Dependent Transcranial Magnetic Closed-Loop Stimulation Controlled by Sensorimotor Desynchronization Induces Robust Increase of Corticospinal Excitability , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  A. Gharabaghi Activity-dependent brain stimulation and robot-assisted movements for use-dependent plasticity , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Levin,et al.  Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  M. Levin,et al.  Feedback and Cognition in Arm Motor Skill Reacquisition After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[21]  M. Levin Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Learned self-regulation of the lesioned brain with epidural electrocorticography , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[23]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Bridging the gap between motor imagery and motor execution with a brain–robot interface , 2015, NeuroImage.

[24]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Arm Motor Recovery Using a Virtual Reality Intervention in Chronic Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Brain state-dependent robotic reaching movement with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton: combining brain-machine interfacing and robotic rehabilitation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Carolee J Winstein,et al.  Providing explicit information disrupts implicit motor learning after basal ganglia stroke. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[29]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Reinforcement learning of self-regulated β-oscillations for motor restoration in chronic stroke , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Brain–robot interface driven plasticity: Distributed modulation of corticospinal excitability , 2016, NeuroImage.

[31]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction? , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Estimating cognitive load during self-regulation of brain activity and neurofeedback with therapeutic brain-computer interfaces , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[33]  Sarah J. Housman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.