Graduate Students and Knowledge Exchange with Local Stakeholders: Possibilities and Preparation

Tropical biologists are exploring ways to expand their role as researchers through knowledge exchange with local stakeholders. Graduate students are well positioned for this broader role, particularly when supported by graduate programs. We ask: (1) how can graduate students effectively engage in knowledge exchange during their research; and (2) how can university programs prepare young scientists to take on this partnership role? We present a conceptual framework with three levels at which graduate students can exchange knowledge with stakeholders (information sharing, skill building, and knowledge generation) and discuss limitations of each. Examples of these strategies included disseminating preliminary research results to southern African villages, building research skills of Brazilian undergraduate students through semester-long internships, and jointly developing and implementing a forest ecology research and training program with one community in the Amazon estuary. Students chose strategies based on stakeholders' interests, research goals, and a realistic evaluation of student capacity and skill set. As strategies became more complex, time invested, skills mobilized, and strength of relationships between students and stakeholders increased. Graduate programs can prepare students for knowledge exchange with partners by developing specialized skills training, nurturing external networks, offering funding, maximizing strengths of universities in developed and developing regions through partnership, and evaluating knowledge exchange experiences. While balancing the needs of academia with those of stakeholders is challenging, the benefits of enhancing local scientific capacity and generating more locally relevant research for improved conservation may be worth the risks associated with implementing this type of graduate training model.

[1]  Cara A. Rockwell,et al.  Ecological limitations of reduced-impact logging at the smallholder scale , 2007 .

[2]  M. Keen,et al.  Social Learning: A new approach to environmental management , 2005 .

[3]  Karen A. Kainer,et al.  A Graduate Education Framework for Tropical Conservation and Development , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  Stephen G. Perz,et al.  The ‘Knowledge Exchange Train’: a model for capacity building for participatory governance in the south-western Amazon , 2007 .

[5]  Susan K. Jacobson,et al.  Communication Skills for Conservation Professionals , 1999 .

[6]  Michael Doyle,et al.  Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making , 1998 .

[7]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  D. Roush.  Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[9]  M. Monroe,et al.  A Framework for Environmental Education Strategies , 2008 .

[10]  E. Bruna,et al.  The Geographical and Institutional Distribution of Ecological Research in the Tropics , 2008 .

[11]  W. Kress,et al.  Beyond Paradise—Meeting the Challenges in Tropical Biology in the 21st Century , 2004 .

[12]  S. Jacobson.  Graduate Education in Conservation Biology , 1990 .

[13]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Behavior : An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing , 2000 .

[14]  Patricia Shanley,et al.  Equitable ecology: collaborative learning for local benefit in Amazonia , 2002 .

[15]  S Vandebuerie,et al.  OUT OF THE LOOP , 2004 .

[16]  J. Cannon,et al.  Training Conservation Biologists in Human Interaction Skills , 1996 .

[17]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[18]  G. Cundill,et al.  Beyond Just Research: Experiences from Southern Africa in Developing Social Learning Partnerships for Resource Conservation Initiatives , 2009 .

[19]  T. Clark.  Developing Policy‐Oriented Curricula for Conservation Biology: Professional and Leadership Education in the Public Interest , 2001 .

[20]  P. Shanley,et al.  Out of the Loop: Why Research Rarely Reaches Policy Makers and the Public and What Can be Done , 2009 .

[21]  I. Guijt.  Negotiated learning: collaborative monitoring in forest resource management , 2007 .

[22]  E. Ferreira,et al.  Limitations and Applications of Parataxonomy for Community Forest Management in Southwestern Amazonia , 2007 .

[23]  Karen A. Kainer,et al.  Partnering for Greater Success: Local Stakeholders and Research in Tropical Biology and Conservation , 2009 .

[24]  M. Hemmati.  Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict , 2002 .

[25]  S. Laird,et al.  Giving back: making research results relevant to local groups and conservation , 2002 .

[26]  Science for the poor : how one woman challenged researchers, ranchers, and loggers in Amazonia , 2006 .

[27]  Patricia Shanley,et al.  Bridging the Gap: How Can Information Access and Exchange Between Conservation Biologists and Field Practitioners be Improved for Better Conservation Outcomes? , 2009 .