Relation between GDSS use and group task complexity: an experimental study

A laboratory experiment was conducted to explore the influence of GDSS (group decision support systems) on decision quality, decision time, and user satisfaction under different levels of group-task complexity. Forty-eight groups each consisting of three members were assigned to four experimental treatments that differed in setting (non-GDSS or GDSS) and in group decision task complexity (low complexity or high). The findings indicate that, compared to working in a non-GDSS setting, the particular GDSS setting used (i) was more effective in solving complex problems, (ii) required more time for a low-complexity task but not for a high-complexity task, and (iii) resulted in lower satisfaction for a low-complexity task but a higher satisfaction for a high-complexity task. These findings help identify what type of group problems are better suited for GDSS use.<<ETX>>

[1]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[2]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[3]  David K. Hsiao,et al.  Heterogeneous Databases: Proliferation, Issues, and Solutions , 1989, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[4]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .

[5]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[6]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Group Decision Support Systems: Determinants of Success , 1987 .

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  The Impact of Computer-Based Support on the Process and Outcomes of Group Decision Making , 1986, ICIS.

[8]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Productivity enhancement from computer-mediated communication: a systems contingency approach , 1988, CACM.

[9]  David R. Henderson,et al.  Are We All Supply‐Siders Now? , 1989 .

[10]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[11]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[12]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  R. Golembiewski Macro organizational behavior , 1980 .

[15]  Paul Gray,et al.  Group decision support systems , 1987, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[18]  Robert H. Miles,et al.  Macro organizational behavior (The Goodyear series in administration and business management) , 1980 .

[19]  M Zviran,et al.  Design considerations for integrated hospital information systems. , 1990, Hospital & health services administration.