Performance over time with a nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant.

This investigation determined whether the audiological performance of cochlear implant users varied with experience. Thirteen Nucleus and 14 Ineraid subjects were evaluated at 1, 9, and 18 mo after cochlear implant connection. Ten Nucleus and five Ineraid subjects were tested at 30 mo. On average, the ability of the subjects to recognize words and phonemes in an audition-only condition improved during the first 9 mo, as did their ability to recognize spondees in noise. The phoneme scores continued to improve during the next 9 mo. Environmental sound recognition improved gradually; significant improvement from the 1 mo scores was not noted until 18 mo. About half of the subjects who demonstrated poor word recognition at 1 mo showed significantly improved percent word correct scores by 18 mo. The Nucleus and Ineraid subjects did not differ in their patterns of change over time. An information transmission analysis performed on the subjects' consonant confusion matrices showed relatively little change for the nasality and place features during the first 18 mo, and relatively large change for the voice, duration, and frication features. Most improvement in the feature scores occurred during the first 9 mo.

[1]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Long‐Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage , 1986, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  D K Kessler,et al.  Analysis and Revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) Battery , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[3]  J Youngblood,et al.  Ineraid® (utah) multichannel cochlear implants , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  P M Seligman,et al.  A multi-channel hearing prosthesis for profound-to-total hearing loss. , 1984, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[5]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  B J Gantz,et al.  Previous experience as a confounding factor in comparing cochlear-implant processing schemes. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  D. Eddington Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  T CAWTHORNE,et al.  Hearing and deafness. , 1961, London Clinic medical journal.

[9]  R. Tyler What Can We Learn about Hearing Aids from Cochlear Implants? , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[10]  P. Seligman Speech-Processing Strategies and Their Implementation , 1987 .

[11]  M F Dorman,et al.  Longitudinal changes in word recognition by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[12]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .