Rasmussen's abstraction hierarchy — more recently called the abstraction-decomposition space (ADS) — has been used for years within the process control domain and is increasingly being used to analyze and model ‘intentional’ systems. The ADS has been the basis for Work Domain Analysis and Ecological Interface Design. However, the researchers new to the ‘Danish’ approach to cognitive engineering have often found using the ADS to be difficult and confusing, particularly when applying it to systems outside process control. A ‘new’ set of labels associated with the five levels of the means-ends dimension of the ADS are suggested. These new labels suggest a much tighter logical relation between means-ends levels and thereby make it more clear what characteristics, functions, and resources of a domain belong at what level of abstraction. Second, an illustration of how these new labels might extend the ADS to intentional systems will be presented and discussed.
[1]
Kim J. Vicente,et al.
Ecological interface design for a power plant feedwater subsystem
,
1996
.
[2]
Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.
Work Domain Analysis for Training-System Definition and Acquisition
,
1999
.
[3]
K. J. Vicente,et al.
Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work
,
1999
.
[4]
Jens Rasmussen,et al.
Cognitive Systems Engineering
,
2022
.
[5]
Catherine M. Burns,et al.
Work Domain Analysis for Intentional Systems
,
1999
.
[6]
Kim J. Vicente,et al.
Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations
,
1992,
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[7]
Kim J. Vicente,et al.
Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete
,
1994,
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[8]
Morten Lind.
MAKING SENSE OF THE ABSTRACTION HIERARCHY
,
1999
.