Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Schul,et al. A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse rise-time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[2] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.
[3] G. Pollack,et al. Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[4] W. Cade,et al. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[5] H. C. Gerhardt,et al. Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[6] D. von Helversen,et al. Selective phonotaxis in Tettigonia cantans and T. viridissima in song recognition and discrimination , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[7] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .
[8] G. Pollack,et al. Phonotaxis to individual rhythmic components of a complex cricket calling song , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.
[9] John A. Doherty,et al. Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: comparisons of choice and no-choice paradigms , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[10] K. Shaw,et al. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[11] Hans Scharstein,et al. Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[12] INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[13] J. Schul,et al. Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia) , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[14] Franz Huber,et al. Frequency and temporal pattern-dependent phonotaxis of crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) during tethered flight and compensated walking , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[15] William E. Wagner. Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[16] H. Gerhardt,et al. Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .
[17] H. Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[18] M. Ryan,et al. SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] J. Doherty,et al. Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog,Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[20] M. Ritchie,et al. The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] H. Gerhardt. Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .
[22] M. Ryan,et al. Phylogenetic influence on mating call preferences in female túngara frogs,Physalaemus pustulosus , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[23] Georg M. Klump,et al. Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[24] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.