Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm

Abstract Studies of mate attraction have traditionally employed one of two experimental methods: choice tests in which female preferences from among two or more signals are tabulated, or single-stimulus tests in which the female response to one signal is quantified. Choice tests have long been preferred for examining mate attraction in anurans. Inspired by Wagner's (1998, Animal Behaviour,55, 1029–1042) discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the two experimental approaches, we used a single-stimulus design to examine mate attraction in two sibling species of treefrogs (Hyla versicolor and H. chrysoscelis). We quantified female responses based upon the relative time required to approach signals varying in pulse rate, pulse rise time and pulse number. The data were used to generate response functions providing a quantitative measure of female attraction to the stimuli. Comparisons with data from choice experiments reveal broad similarities, as well as properties of female responses that had not been detected with choice tests. The results are discussed with regard to female selectivity for call parameters that are likely to mediate sexual selection and homospecific pairing.

[1]  J. Schul,et al.  A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse rise-time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[3]  G. Pollack,et al.  Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  W. Cade,et al.  Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  D. von Helversen,et al.  Selective phonotaxis in Tettigonia cantans and T. viridissima in song recognition and discrimination , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .

[8]  G. Pollack,et al.  Phonotaxis to individual rhythmic components of a complex cricket calling song , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  John A. Doherty,et al.  Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: comparisons of choice and no-choice paradigms , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  K. Shaw,et al.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Hans Scharstein,et al.  Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  J. Schul,et al.  Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia) , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  Franz Huber,et al.  Frequency and temporal pattern-dependent phonotaxis of crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) during tethered flight and compensated walking , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  William E. Wagner Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .

[17]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  M. Ryan,et al.  SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  J. Doherty,et al.  Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog,Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  M. Ritchie,et al.  The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  H. Gerhardt Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .

[22]  M. Ryan,et al.  Phylogenetic influence on mating call preferences in female túngara frogs,Physalaemus pustulosus , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.