Abstract The use of construction and building materials is connected with important amounts of raw materials as well as energy inputs. Construction contributes to integrated building management an issue that has been analysed in several research works and projects. In order to quantify the environmental impact of a production process it is essential to create the inventory analysis of the raw materials used as well as the energy consume within the system studied. There are several environmental assessment tools developed to evaluate environmental impact in connection to economic effectiveness. The rising economic and environmental sustainability challenges which the construction sector faces as part of the competitive, globalized economy is the reason for evaluating the environmental criteria in the decision making process. In that sense, decarbonisation and circular economy support the European vision for sustainability and clean energy. The goal of this study is to benchmark carbon footprint in relation to the system’s boundaries. Indicators related to carbon emissions and different approaches based on system’s boundaries (including cradle to grave, cradle to site, cradle to gate) have been defined and introduced. Moreover, carbon footprint indicators as well as circularity indicators were calculated for insulation materials’ production process. . Also, efforts to shift towards a circular economy are made under real conditions, comparing the closed loops to linear flows for the two production processes. Finally, the recycling scenario is compared to the linear flow, demonstrating the relevance of carbon indicators. One of the key findings of the research is that circular economy can be expand in two directions: (a) on a single material or process level, one has to establish the availability of reliable data that will enable the study from cradle to grave since there is a huge variety of building materials and elements that can be found (b) on a bigger scale, one has to consider whole systems. In both cases a number of parameters such as energy use, raw materials input, and operational cost can be affected and improved.
[1]
Brais Suárez-Eiroa,et al.
Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice
,
2019,
Journal of Cleaner Production.
[2]
Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.
Energy, environmental and economic optimization of thermal insulation solutions by means of an integ
,
2011
.
[3]
Reinout Heijungs,et al.
Uncertainty analysis in embodied carbon assessments : What are the implications of its omission?
,
2018
.
[4]
E. Giama,et al.
Assessment tools for the environmental evaluation of concrete, plaster and brick elements production
,
2015
.
[5]
Inger Andresen,et al.
A Database Tool for Systematic Analysis of Embodied Emissions in Buildings and Neighborhoods
,
2018,
Buildings.
[6]
Seyoum Eshetu Birkie,et al.
Circular economy as an essentially contested concept
,
2018
.
[7]
T. Wiedmann.
EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION
,
2009
.
[8]
Arnold Tukker,et al.
Growth in Environmental Footprints and Environmental Impacts Embodied in Trade: Resource Efficiency Indicators from EXIOBASE3
,
2018
.
[9]
Mohamed Osmani,et al.
Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers
,
2017
.
[10]
Francesco Bianchi,et al.
Insulation materials for the building sector: A review and comparative analysis
,
2016
.
[11]
Olatz Irulegi,et al.
Energy Performance of Buildings
,
2016
.
[12]
A. Rashid,et al.
Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
,
2016
.
[13]
Ali Akbarnezhad,et al.
Estimation and Minimization of Embodied Carbon of Buildings: A Review
,
2017
.