Organisation-Oriented Super-Peer Networks for Digital Libraries

The transition from traditional paper libraries to digital libraries enables new strategies for the use and maintenance of artifact collections. We present an organization-oriented super-peer network which represents the organizational structures of distributed digital libraries in a natural way and is able to integrate distributed resources as well as local devices. Organizational structures can be considered in searching and accessing distributed services and documents. The approach leads to a generalised support for the self-organization of widely distributed, loosely coupled, and autonomous digital library systems which can be structured by arbitrary inter- and intra-organizational relationships.

[1]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Super-peer-based routing strategies for RDF-based peer-to-peer networks , 2004, J. Web Semant..

[2]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Adaptive replication strategies and software architectures for peer-to-peer systems , 2005 .

[3]  Ricarda Weber.  Chablis - Market Analysis of Digital Payment Systems , 1998 .

[4]  Luis Gravano,et al.  Metadata for digital libraries: architecture and design rationale , 1997, DL '97.

[5]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Designing a super-peer network , 2003, Proceedings 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.03CH37405).

[6]  David R. Karger,et al.  Looking up data in P2P systems , 2003, CACM.

[7]  Mark Handley,et al.  A scalable content-addressable network , 2001, SIGCOMM '01.

[8]  Hans-Werner Sehring,et al.  Subject-Oriented Work: Lessons Learned from an Interdisciplinary Content Management Project , 2001, ADBIS.

[9]  Klaus Wehrle,et al.  Peer-to-Peer-Networking & -Computing , 2003, Informatik-Spektrum.

[10]  Claudia Niederée,et al.  C-Merge: A Tool for Policy-Based Merging of Resource Classifications , 2001, ECDL.

[11]  Stefan Savage,et al.  Structured superpeers: leveraging heterogeneity to provide constant-time lookup , 2003, Proceedings the Third IEEE Workshop on Internet Applications. WIAPP 2003.

[12]  Claudia Niederée,et al.  Linguistic and architectural requirements for personalized digital libraries , 1996, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[13]  Antony I. T. Rowstron,et al.  Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems , 2001, Middleware.

[14]  Guillaume Urvoy-Keller,et al.  Hierarchical Peer-To-Peer Systems , 2003, Parallel Process. Lett..

[15]  Matthias Hemmje,et al.  Towards Digital Library Mediation for Web Services , 2002 .

[16]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  HyperCuP - Hypercubes, Ontologies, and Efficient Search on Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2002, AP2PC.

[17]  Luis Gravano,et al.  The Stanford Digital Library metadata architecture , 1997, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[18]  Nicola Ferro,et al.  Annotations in Digital Libraries and Collaboratories - Facets, Models and Usage , 2004, ECDL.

[19]  Rüdiger Schollmeier,et al.  A definition of peer-to-peer networking for the classification of peer-to-peer architectures and applications , 2001, Proceedings First International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing.

[20]  David R. Karger,et al.  Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications , 2001, SIGCOMM '01.

[21]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Tapestry: a resilient global-scale overlay for service deployment , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  Klaus Wehrle,et al.  Peer-to-peer-networking and -computing , 2004 .