Ablation Index Outcome in Redo Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results of a Short-Term Study

Background Ablation index (AI) is a novel catheter-based parameter that has improved the outcome and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs). This index incorporates contact force (CF) (g), time (s), and power (W) parameters. The role of AI in redo ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation (peAF) has not been fully investigated. Hence, the impact of AI on the success of the redo PVI during the short-term follow-up period is the aim of this study. Methods A retrospective analysis of 39 consecutive patients who underwent redo PVI ablations for peAF was carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. Target values for AI were 500 - 550 for anterior and roof and 400 - 380 for posterior and inferior regions. We compared outcomes between AI-guided and catheter CF ablations (i.e., forced time integral (FTI) of more than 400 g/s) during a follow-up of 24 months. Results Pulmonary vein reconnections at redo procedure were similar in both groups (P = 0.1). AF free burden period was non-significant (mean 15.53 ± 2.4 months in AI group vs. 15.22 ± 1.9 months in CF group, P = 0.79) at 24 months. The AI group demonstrated greater numbers of patients for whom anti-arrhythmic therapy could be de-escalated over 1 year (n = 11 (65%) in AI vs. n = 6 (27%) in CF, P = 0.02). Fewer patients underwent escalation of their anti-arrhythmic therapy (n = 2 (12%) in AI vs. n = 7 (32%) in CF, P = 0.15). The AI group trended towards a shorter procedure time (111.6 ± 27 min) compared to the CF group (133 ± 40 min) (P = 0.06). Other procedural details were comparable. Conclusion Redo PVI interventions using AI lead to a significant de-escalation in medication during follow-up. Procedure time and radiation dose using AI tends to be shorter. Both techniques are safe with minimal complications.

[1]  N. Szegedi,et al.  New Results in Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation , 2019, Epidemiology and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

[2]  A. Natale,et al.  An ablation index operator-independent approach to improve efficacy in atrial fibrillation ablation at 24-month follow-up: a single center experience , 2019, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[3]  R. Pranata,et al.  Ablation-index guided versus conventional contact-force guided ablation in pulmonary vein isolation – Systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal.

[4]  G. Dhillon,et al.  A multicentered evaluation of ablation at higher power guided by ablation index: Establishing ablation targets for pulmonary vein isolation , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Knecht,et al.  Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol. , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  S. Willems,et al.  Ablation Index for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation - Clinical Applicability and Comparison With Force-Time Integral. , 2018, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[8]  A. Natale,et al.  Use of Ablation Index-Guided Ablation Results in High Rates of Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Freedom From Arrhythmia in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients: The PRAISE Study Results , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[9]  A. De Simone,et al.  Safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by Ablation Index module , 2018, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[10]  Frederick T. Han,et al.  Durable lesion formation while avoiding esophageal injury during ablation of atrial fibrillation: Lessons learned from late gadolinium MR imaging , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  V. Reddy,et al.  Chamber-Specific Radiofrequency Lesion Dimension Estimation Using Novel Catheter-Based Tissue Interface Temperature Sensing: A Preclinical Assessment. , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[12]  Ahmed Hussein,et al.  Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[13]  Laura J. Bonnett,et al.  Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  P. Sanders,et al.  A minimal or maximal ablation strategy to achieve pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective multi-centre randomized controlled trial (the Minimax study). , 2015, European heart journal.

[15]  Jan Petru,et al.  EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Erez Silberschein,et al.  Abstract 12104: Prospective Study Using a New Formula Incorporating Contact Force, Radiofrequency Power and Application Time (Force-Power-Time Index) for Quantifying Lesion Formation to Guide Long Continuous Atrial lesions in the Beating Canine Heart , 2013 .

[17]  Jan Petru,et al.  Electrical Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Is Contingent on Contact Force During Initial Treatment: Results From the EFFICAS I Study , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[18]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Complications of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in a High‐Volume Center in 1,000 Procedures: Still Cause for Concern? , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[19]  B. Knight,et al.  Approaches to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2009, Heart rhythm.