On the statics of No-Tension masonry-like vaults and shells: solution domains, operative treatment and numerical validation

In the paper, structural analysis of masonry vaults is based on the fundamental assumption that the material cannot resist tensile stresses. For the vault to work as a No-Tension (NT) structure, it is recognized that a membrane surface completely included in the thickness of the vault exists [Heyman (1977) Equilibrium of shell structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford], designed in way to resist applied loads by purely compressive membrane forces. After reducing the problem to a plane-stress problem, the stress function Ψ(x,y) is introduced, like in the classical Pucher’s approach. Statically admissible solutions are proven to be ruled by the non-homogeneous Monge-Ampere equation. Anyway purely admissible stress fields often yield non-compatible and non-credible results with reference to fractures and strains. A path aimed at generating sets of solutions related to given load shapes is outlined, as a preliminary basis for solutions fully accomplishing not only equilibrium and admissibility, but also compatibility with strains and fractures. Further analytical developments, set up of operative procedures, validation by means of numerical campaign, investigation of special characters of approximations when dealing with particular load shapes, i.e. all topics related to operative features of the proposed approach are presented in the second part of the paper. Starting from the path outlined for identifying solution domains, a constrained optimization is set up to minimize a suitably defined square error function calculated between the assigned objective load function and the membrane surface expression, under the condition that the solution membrane function is contained in the vault profile. Some analytical management is needed in order to reduce the dependence of the problem on the number of parameters, and to partially simplify and expedite the subsequent numerical simulation. Thereafter, ad hoc calculus codes are built up for implementing the problem and performing the numerical investigation. Final validation of the approach is given by demonstrating, with some numerical applications, the effectiveness of the method even for load shapes difficult to be handled.

[1]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Practical Methods of Optimization: Fletcher/Practical Methods of Optimization , 2000 .

[2]  D. Fairlie,et al.  General solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation in n-dimensional space , 1994, hep-th/9403134.

[3]  A. Ugural Stresses in plates and shells , 1981 .

[4]  R. Livesley Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks , 1978 .

[5]  Climent Molins,et al.  CAPACITY OF MASONRY ARCHES AND SPATIAL FRAMES , 1998 .

[6]  Luke Bisby,et al.  Temperature Effects in Adhesively Bonded FRP Strengthening Applied to Steel Beams: Experimental Observations , 2010 .

[7]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[8]  Dermot O'Dwyer,et al.  Funicular analysis of masonry vaults , 1999 .

[9]  Philippe Block,et al.  Real-time limit analysis of vaulted masonry buildings , 2006 .

[10]  S. Nash Penalty and Barrier Methods , 2011 .

[11]  D. Gilbarg,et al.  Elliptic Partial Differential Equa-tions of Second Order , 1977 .

[12]  Alessandro Baratta,et al.  Relationships of LA theorems for NRT structures by means of duality , 2005 .

[13]  A. Baratta,et al.  Duality in non-linear programming for limit analysis of not resisting tension bodies , 2007 .

[14]  A. V. Manzhirov,et al.  Handbook of mathematics for engineers and scientists , 2006 .

[15]  Clive. Melbourne,et al.  RIGID-BLOCK ANALYSIS OF MASONRY STRUCTURES , 1994 .

[16]  Alessandro Baratta,et al.  Stress analysis of masonry vaults and static efficacy of FRP repairs , 2007 .

[17]  Alessandro Baratta,et al.  On the equilibrium and admissibility coupling in NT vaults of general shape , 2010 .

[18]  P. A. Cundall,et al.  FORMULATION OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISTINCT ELEMENT MODEL - PART I. A SCHEME TO DETECT AND REPRESENT CONTACTS IN A SYSTEM COMPOSED OF MANY POLYHEDRAL BLOCKS , 1988 .

[19]  Alessandro Baratta,et al.  AN APPROACH TO MASONRY STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY THE NO-TENSION ASSUMPTION-PART I: MATERIAL MODELING, THEORETICAL SETUP, AND CLOSED FORM SOLUTIONS , 2010 .

[20]  Thomas E. Boothby Analysis of masonry arches and vaults , 2001 .

[21]  Elio Sacco,et al.  A nonlinear homogenization procedure for periodic masonry , 2009 .

[22]  Jacques Heyman Equilibrium of shell structures , 1977 .

[23]  Alessandro Baratta,et al.  On variational approaches in NRT continua , 2003 .

[24]  Nicola Zani,et al.  The Maximum Modulus Eccentricities Surface for Masonry Vaults and Limit Analysis , 1999 .

[25]  Santiago Sánchez-Cervera Huerta,et al.  Mechanics of masonry vaults: The equilibrium approach , 2001 .

[26]  Santiago Sánchez-Cervera Huerta,et al.  The Analysis of Masonry Architecture: A Historical Approach , 2008 .

[27]  E.A.W. Maunder Limit Analysis Of Masonry Structures BasedOn Discrete Elements , 1970 .

[28]  D. Varberg Convex Functions , 1973 .

[29]  Alessandro Baratta,et al.  An Approach to Masonry Structural Analysis by the No-Tension Assumption—Part II: Load Singularities, Numerical Implementation and Applications , 2010 .

[30]  R. Livesley A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures , 1992 .