Changing the P 300 Brain Computer Interface

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are now feasible for use as an alternative control option for those with severe motor impairments. The P300 component of the evoked potential has proven useful as a control signal. Individuals do not need to be trained to produce the signal, and it is fairly stable and has a large evoked potential. Even with recent signal classification advances, on-line experiments with P300-based BCIs remain far from perfect. We present two potential methods for improving control accuracy. Experimental results in an evoked potential BCI, used to control items in a virtual apartment, show a reduced response exists when items are accidentally controlled. The presence of a P300-like signal in response to goal items means that it can be used for automatic error correction. Preliminary results from an interface experiment using three different button configurations for a yes/no BCI task show that the configuration of buttons may affect on-line signal classification. These results will be discussed in light of the special considerations needed when working with an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patient. 694 CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR Volume 7, Number 6, 2004 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

[1]  ROBERT M. CHAPMAN,et al.  Evoked Responses to Numerical and Non-Numerical Visual Stimuli while Problem Solving , 1964, Nature.

[2]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[3]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Masud Mansuripur,et al.  Introduction to information theory , 1986 .

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Elliot Cole,et al.  Participatory design for sensitive interface parameters: contributions of traumatic brain injury patients to their prosthetic software , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[8]  M. Onofrj,et al.  Reappearance of event-related P3 potential in locked-in syndrome. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Extended ICA Removes Artifacts from Electroencephalographic Recordings , 1997, NIPS.

[10]  P. Kennedy,et al.  Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[13]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[14]  Melody Moore Jackson,et al.  Human factors issues in the neural signals direct brain-computer interfaces , 2000, Assets '00.

[15]  Jessica D. Bayliss,et al.  A Flexible Brain-Computer Interface , 2001 .

[16]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  Improving Transfer Rates in Brain Computer Interfacing: A Case Study , 2002, NIPS.

[17]  S. Meagher.  Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[18]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Linear Spatial Integration for Single-Trial Detection in Encephalography , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  J. Mourino,et al.  Asynchronous BCI and local neural classifiers: an overview of the adaptive brain interface project , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  P. Sajda,et al.  Response error correction-a demonstration of improved human-machine performance using real-time EEG monitoring , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  J.D. Bayliss,et al.  Use of the evoked potential P3 component for control in a virtual apartment , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .