Copper filtration in pediatric digital X-ray imaging: its impact on image quality and dose

The effect of copper (Cu) filtration on image quality and dose in different digital X-ray systems was investigated. Two computed radiography systems and one digital radiography detector were used. Three different polymethylmethacrylate blocks simulated the pediatric body. The effect of Cu filters of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm thickness on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the corresponding effective doses (EDs) were measured at tube voltages of 60, 66, and 73 kV. Image quality was evaluated in a contrast-detail phantom with an automated analyzer software. Cu filters of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm thickness decreased the ESD by 25–32%, 32–39%, and 40–44%, respectively, the ranges depending on the respective tube voltages. There was no consistent decline in image quality due to increasing Cu filtration. The estimated ED of anterior-posterior (AP) chest projections was reduced by up to 23%. No relevant reduction in the ED was noted in AP radiographs of the abdomen and pelvis or in posterior–anterior radiographs of the chest. Cu filtration reduces the ESD, but generally does not reduce the effective dose. Cu filters can help protect radiosensitive superficial organs, such as the mammary glands in AP chest projections.

[1]  M. Tapiovaara,et al.  PCXMC. A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations , 1997 .

[2]  H. Venema,et al.  Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  C P Lawinski,et al.  Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images—comparison with subjective visual assessment , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  R. Behrman.  The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology. , 2002, Medical physics.

[5]  C. Fink,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector. , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[6]  Markus Völk,et al.  Evaluation of Lossy Data Compression of Chest X-Rays: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Study , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[7]  J. Pease.  Guidelines on best practice in the x-ray imaging of children: J. V. Cook, A. Pettett, K. Shah, S. Pablot, J. Kyriuo and M. Fitzgerald. St George's Healthcare Radiological Protection Centre, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 OQT , 1999 .

[8]  R. Nicholson,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Maximilian F Reiser,et al.  Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  P. Shrimpton,et al.  The influence of tube filtration and potential on patient dose during x-ray examinations. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  E. Kotter,et al.  Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors , 2002, European Radiology.

[12]  B Geiger,et al.  Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[13]  M. Reiser,et al.  Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage phosphor technology in normal patients , 2002, European Radiology.

[14]  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop,et al.  Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[15]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[16]  P. Vock,et al.  An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  P. Xue,et al.  Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  M. Tapiovaara,et al.  PCXMC, A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations (2nd Ed , 2008 .

[19]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.