Cognitive benefits of scenario planning: Its impact on biases and decision quality

In this paper, we examine cognitive benefits of scenario planning. Drawing on behavioral decision theory, we analyze the effect of scenario planning on the widely discussed framing bias in decision making as well as on decision quality. In an experiment involving 252 graduate management students, we find that scenario planning reduces the framing bias and that it has a more positive effect on decision quality than tools traditionally used in strategic planning. Thus, our paper contributes to the discussion analyzing the scenario method's benefits by providing additional support for its positive cognitive consequences as well as the method's aggregate effect on decision quality. It presents evidence that popular strategy tools like scenario planning, whose positive cognitive effects are widely claimed in the literature, may in fact alter biases and decision quality.

[1]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  From Thinking About What Might Have Been to Sharing What We Know: The Role of Counterfactual Mind-Sets in Information Sharing in Groups , 2002 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[3]  R. Thaler,et al.  Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time , 1997 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[5]  George Wright,et al.  The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios , 2002 .

[6]  Stephen M. Millett,et al.  The future of scenarios: challenges and opportunities , 2003 .

[7]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[8]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[9]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  Heuristics, biases and strategic decision making , 2002 .

[10]  E. Langer.  The illusion of control. , 1975 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[12]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Further reflections on the elimination of framing bias in strategic decision making , 2002 .

[13]  Winston R. Sieck,et al.  Exposition Effects on Decision Making: Choice and Confidence in Choice , 1997 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[15]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[16]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[17]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  How Can Decision Making Be Improved? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  M. Bazerman,et al.  BLIND SPOTS IN INDUSTRY AND COMPETITOR ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS OF INTERFIRM (MIS)PERCEPTIONS FOR STRATEGIC DECISIONS , 1991 .

[19]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[20]  P. Schoemaker.  MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[21]  Rodolphe Durand.  Predicting a firm's forecasting ability: The roles of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention , 2003 .

[22]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions , 2003 .

[24]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[25]  Carl P. Zeithaml,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A test of relevance to practitioners , 1989 .

[26]  Keith D. Markman,et al.  Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. , 1995 .

[27]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Need for Cognition and Choice Framing Effects , 1996 .

[28]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Eliminating a framing bias by using simple instructions to 'think harder' and respondents with managerial experience: comment on breaking the frame. , 2002 .

[29]  T. Das,et al.  Cognitive Biases and Strategic Decision Processes: An Integrative Perspective , 1999 .

[30]  R. Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases , 1989 .

[31]  Robert E. Linneman,et al.  The use of multiple scenarios by U.S. industrial companies: A comparison study, 1977–1981☆ , 1983 .

[32]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings , 1989 .

[33]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain , 2006, Science.

[34]  Michael Morrison,et al.  El modelo exacto del alto ejecutivo moderno , 2007 .

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  An Empirical Study of Flexibility in Manufacturing , 1995 .

[37]  K. J. Ives,et al.  Experimental Methods (2) , 1978 .

[38]  Colin Camerer.  Prospect Theory In The Wild: Evidence From The Field , 1998 .

[39]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  The Role of Strategy Workshops in Strategy Development Processes : Formality, Communication, Co-ordination and Inclusion , 2006 .

[40]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[42]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[43]  Charles R. Schwenk.  Why sacrifice rigour for relevance? A proposal for combining laboratory and field research in strategic management , 1982 .

[44]  P. Schoemaker.  Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[45]  K. Glaister,et al.  Breaking the frame: an analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty , 1999 .

[46]  Kristine M. Kuhn,et al.  Confidence and Uncertainty in Judgmental Forecasting: Differential Effects of Scenario Presentation , 1996 .

[47]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. , 2000 .

[48]  Steven K. Jones,et al.  The Effect of Outcome Information on the Evaluation and Recall of Individuals' Own Decisions , 1997 .

[49]  R. Hogarth.  Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1982 .

[50]  Charles R. Schwenk.  Strategic Decision Making , 1995 .

[51]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[52]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[53]  J. Morecroft,et al.  Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm , 2010 .

[54]  Joshua Klayman,et al.  Overconfidence in interval estimates. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning , 2008 .

[56]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Studying scenario planning: Theory, research suggestions, and hypotheses , 2005 .

[57]  H. Arkes.  Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. , 1991 .

[58]  Craig S. Fleisher,et al.  Analysis Without Paralysis: 10 Tools to Make Better Strategic Decisions , 2008 .

[59]  Pentti Malaska,et al.  Multiple Scenario Approach and Strategic Behaviour in European Companies , 1985 .

[60]  J. Carroll.  The Effect of Imagining an Event on Expectations for the Event: An Interpretation in Terms of the Availability Heuristic. , 1978 .

[61]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Improving decision-making with scenario planning , 2004 .

[62]  Ron Bradfield.  Cognitive Barriers in the Scenario Development Process , 2008 .

[63]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Troubling futures: Scenarios and scenario planning for organizational decision making , 2008 .

[64]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[65]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell , 1992 .

[66]  Henry Mintzberg.  The rise and fall of strategic planning , 1993 .

[67]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[68]  R. Phelps,et al.  Does scenario planning affect performance? Two exploratory studies , 2001 .

[69]  G. Hodgkinson.  Cognitive processes in strategic management: Some emerging trends and future directions , 2001 .

[70]  R. Grant.  Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors , 2003 .