Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition : bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge

We report evidence from a PET activation study that the inferior occipital gyri (likely to include area V2) and the posterior parts of the fusiform and inferior temporal gyri are involved in the integration of visual elements into perceptual wholes (single objects). Of these areas, the fusiform and inferior temporal gyri were more activated by tasks with recognizable stimuli than by tasks with unrecognizable stimuli. We propose that the posterior parts of the fusiform and inferior temporal gyri, compared with the inferior occipital gyri, are involved in higher level integration, due to the involvement of re-entrant activation from stored structural knowledge. Evidence in favor of this interpretation comes from the additional finding that activation of the anterior part of the left fusiform gyrus and a more anterior part of the right inferior temporal gyrus, areas previously associated with access to stored structural knowledge, was found with recognizable stimuli, but not with unrecognizable stimuli. This latter finding also indicates: (i) that subjects may not refrain from (automatically) identifying objects even if they only have to attend to the objects’ global shape, and (ii) that perceptual and memorial processes can be dissociated on both functional and anatomical grounds. No evidence was obtained for the involvement of the parietal lobes in the integration of single objects. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  A. Neuren Visual Agnosia , 1991, Neurology.

[3]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Clarke,et al.  Occipital cortex in man: Organization of callosal connections, related myelo‐ and cytoarchitecture, and putative boundaries of functional visual areas , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  Effects of Timing and Duration of Cognitive Activation in [15O]Water PET Studies , 1994, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[8]  S. Zeki,et al.  The position and topography of the human colour centre as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  G. Rees Statistical Parametric Mapping , 2004, Practical Neurology.

[10]  M. Farah Distinguishing Perceptual and Semantic Impairments Affecting Visual Object Recognition , 1997 .

[11]  M. Mintun,et al.  Noninvasive functional brain mapping by change-distribution analysis of averaged PET images of H215O tissue activity. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  T G Turkington,et al.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  C. Price,et al.  A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The computation of occluded contours in visual agnosia: Evidence for early computation prior to shape binding and figure-ground coding , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  M. J. Riddoch,et al.  Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia , 1987 .

[17]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A verbal-semantic category-specific recognition impairment , 1993 .

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Detection of Thirty-Second Cognitive Activations in Single Subjects with Positron Emission Tomography: A New Low-Dose H215O Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Three-Dimensional Imaging Technique , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[19]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[20]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[21]  J. Wagemans,et al.  The Representation of Shape in the Context of Visual Object Categorization Tasks , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[23]  H. Coslett,et al.  Simultanagnosia. To see but not two see. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  O. Paulson,et al.  Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of the human brain: positron emission tomography--a new neuroanatomical technique. , 1994, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  S. Zeki,et al.  Brain Activity Related to the Perception of Illusory Contours , 1996, NeuroImage.

[29]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Functional (PET) Images: The Assessment of Significant Change , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[32]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Improved signal-to-noise in PET activation studies using switched paradigms. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[35]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Retinotopic Maps in Human Prestriate Visual Cortex: The Demarcation of Areas V2 and V3 , 1995, NeuroImage.

[36]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Parallel pattern processing and visual agnosia. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[38]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[39]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information , 1995, Nature.

[40]  M. Strominger Case Studies in the Neuropsychology of Vision , 2003 .

[41]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  I Law,et al.  Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition A PET Study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The computation of perceptual structure from collinearity and closure: Normality and pathology , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.