Using design languages for conceptual modelling : the UML case

[1]  Shouhong Wang Two MIS Analysis Methods: An Experimental Comparison , 1996 .

[2]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[3]  J. Austin How to do things with words , 1962 .

[4]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[5]  M. Morisio,et al.  Extending UML to support domain analysis , 2000, Proceedings ASE 2000. Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering.

[6]  W. Quine The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .

[7]  André Le Grand,et al.  Specialization of Object Lifecycles , 1998 .

[8]  Ellen M. Hufnagel,et al.  User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems - A Meta Model Approach , 1998, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Improving the Quality of Entity Relationship Models - Experience in Research and Practice , 1998, ER.

[11]  David Harel,et al.  On the behavioral inheritance of state-based objects , 2000, Proceedings. 34th International Conference on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems - TOOLS 34.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[13]  Luiz Fernando Capretz A brief history of the object-oriented approach , 2003, SOEN.

[14]  Peter Wegner Dimensions of object-based language design , 1987, OOPSLA 1987.

[15]  Gunnar Övergaard,et al.  A Formal Approach to Use Cases and Their Relationships , 1998, UML.

[16]  R. Mayer Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[17]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  ONTOLOGY Applications and Design , 2002 .

[18]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean , 2002, CACM.

[19]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  How Do We Understand a System with (So) Many Diagrams? Cognitive Integration Processes in Diagrammatic Reasoning , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Joey F. George,et al.  Modern Systems Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[21]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Statistical Reasoning for the Behavioral Sciences , 1980 .

[22]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications , 1990 .

[23]  Yair Wand,et al.  Using objects for systems analysis , 1997, CACM.

[24]  Yanchun Zhang,et al.  An analytical evaluation of NIAM'S grammar for conceptual schema diagrams , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[25]  Elisabetta Morandin,et al.  A reuse-based software process based on domain analysis and OO framework , 1998, Proceedings. 24th EUROMICRO Conference (Cat. No.98EX204).

[26]  Reinhard Schütte,et al.  The Guidelines of Modeling - An Approach to Enhance the Quality in Information Models , 1998, ER.

[27]  David Harel,et al.  On visual formalisms , 1988, CACM.

[28]  P. Pirolli,et al.  Spread of activation. , 1984 .

[29]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[30]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling , 1999, TODS.

[31]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Comprehending Object and Process Models: An Empirical Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[32]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Object-Oriented Modeling and Design , 1991, TOOLS.

[33]  R. Chisholm A Realistic Theory of Categories: An Essay on Ontology , 1998 .

[34]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[35]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[36]  Timothy L. Nyerges,et al.  Developing and Using Interaction Coding Systems for Studying Groupware Use , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  Jean Bézivin,et al.  UML: The Birth and Rise of a Standard Modeling Notation , 1998, UML.

[38]  Bertrand Meyer The many faces of inheritance: a taxonomy of taxonomy , 1996, Computer.

[39]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1998, ER.

[40]  Chris Dollin,et al.  Object-oriented development: the fusion method , 1994 .

[41]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[42]  Alexander Knapp A Formal Semantics for UML Interactions , 1999, UML.

[43]  G. Arango Domain analysis: from art form to engineering discipline , 1989, IWSSD '89.

[44]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[45]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  C. P. Jobling,et al.  The object-oriented paradigm: a means for revolutionising software development , 1993 .

[47]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Grounding the OML metamodel in ontology , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[48]  Kevin Lano,et al.  Semantics and Transformations for UML Models , 1998, UML.

[49]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[50]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Object-Oriented Systems Development: A Review of Empirical Research , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Comparing representations with relational and EER models , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[52]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Cognitive Fit in Requirements Modeling: A Study of Object and Process Methodologies , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Andy Evans,et al.  Core Meta-Modelling Semantics of UML: The pUML Approach , 1999, UML.

[54]  P. Angeles Dictionary of Philosophy , 1981 .

[55]  Peter Loos,et al.  Ontological Evaluation of Reference Models Using the Bunge-Wand-Weber Model , 2003, AMCIS.

[56]  John Krogstie,et al.  Towards a Deeper Understanding of Quality in Requirements Engineering , 1995, CAiSE.

[57]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Using Meta Models for the Comparison of Ontologies , 2003 .

[58]  John D. McGregor,et al.  Understanding object-oriented: a unifying paradigm , 1990, CACM.

[59]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[60]  Andy S. Evans,et al.  Reasoning with UML class diagrams , 1998, Proceedings. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Industrial Strength Formal Specification Techniques.

[61]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  Exemplary and complete object interaction descriptions , 1998, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[62]  W. C. Guenther,et al.  Analysis of variance , 1968, The Mathematical Gazette.

[63]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[64]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A speech-act-based office modeling approach , 1988, TOIS.

[65]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  A collaborative approach to ontology design , 2002, CACM.

[66]  David Harel,et al.  Executable object modeling with statecharts , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[67]  Andy Evans,et al.  Rigorous Development in UML , 1999, FASE.

[68]  Sholom Cohen,et al.  Object-oriented technology and domain analysis , 1998, Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (Cat. No.98TB100203).

[69]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  An Ontological Evaluation of the OML Metamodel , 2000, ISCO.

[70]  Johan Lilius,et al.  Formalising UML State Machines for Model Checking , 1999, UML.

[71]  Edward Yourdon,et al.  Object-oriented analysis , 2012 .

[72]  Charles Lakos,et al.  Behaviour inheritance for object lifecycles , 2000, Proceedings 33rd International Conference on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems TOOLS 33.

[73]  Hassan Gomaa,et al.  An object-oriented domain analysis and modeling method for software reuse , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[74]  Alan K. Mackworth Consistency in Networks of Relations , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[75]  Kasper Østerbye,et al.  A conceptual perspective on the comparison of object-oriented programming languages , 1996, SIGP.

[76]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[77]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[78]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  Systems, Views and Models of UML , 2014, UML Workshop.

[79]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  Object-oriented software engineering - a use case driven approach , 1993, TOOLS.

[80]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[81]  J. Baron,et al.  Notes on the use of R for psychology experiments and questionnaires , 2003 .

[82]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[83]  Yair Wand,et al.  A Proposal for a Formal Model of Objects , 1989, Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications.

[84]  Kazunori Matsumoto,et al.  A three-view model for developing object-oriented frameworks , 2001, Proceedings 39th International Conference and Exhibition on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 39.

[85]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs , 2002, Inf. Syst..

[86]  Chris Welty,et al.  FOIS introduction: Ontology---towards a new synthesis , 2001, FOIS.

[87]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[88]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  The UML as a formal modeling notation , 1998, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[89]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge–Wand–Weber Model , 2002, Software and Systems Modeling.

[90]  Andreas L. Opdahl,et al.  Concepts for Real-World Modelling , 1993, CAiSE.

[91]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  ARIS - Business Process Modeling , 1998 .

[92]  Joerg Evermann,et al.  Towards Ontologically Based Semantics for UML Constructs , 2001, ER.

[93]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[94]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  Meta-Modelling Semantics of UML , 2014, Behavioral Specifications of Businesses and Systems.

[95]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[96]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[97]  Peter Green Enhancing the process of ontological analysis: The 'Who cares' dimension , 1999 .

[98]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  An Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Modelling , 1999, CAiSE.

[99]  Ron Weber,et al.  Mario Bunge's ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts , 1990 .

[100]  Andrew C. Gemino Empirical comparisons of system analysis modeling techniques , 1999 .

[101]  Ron Weber,et al.  Optional Properties Versus Subtyping in Conceptual Modeling: A Theory and Empirical Test , 1996, ICIS.

[102]  Ron Weber,et al.  An Ontological Evaluation of Systems Analysis and Design Methods , 1989, ISCO.

[103]  Ron Weber,et al.  Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[104]  Antero Taivalsaari,et al.  On the notion of inheritance , 1996, CSUR.

[105]  Andrea Valerio,et al.  Exploiting enterprise knowledge through domain analysis and frameworks: an experimental work , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[106]  T. M. Rajkumar,et al.  Comparison of analysis techniques for information requirement determination , 1988, CACM.

[107]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[108]  Reinhard Schütte,et al.  Architectures for Evaluating the Quality of Information Models - a Meta and an Object Level Comparison , 1999, ER.

[109]  Michael Schrefl,et al.  Behavior-consistent specialization of object life cycles , 2002, TSEM.

[110]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effect of Multimedia on Perceived Equivocality and Perceived Usefulness of Information Systems , 2000, MIS Q..