Depth perception in real and virtual environments: An exploration of individual differences

Virtual Reality Environments are becoming increasingly common in the design of automobiles and airplanes for their potential to reduce labourious and time intensive design processes. Unfortunately, variations in users' abilities to correctly perceive depth using virtual reality displays are a substantial obstacle to their use in industry. To examine this problem, a psychophysical experiment was conducted using a staircase method to observe how the difference threshold in a distance discrimination task varied in comparisons of real and virtual stimuli. A questionnaire was also used to explore whether the subject's background and previous training, or their ability to tolerate ambiguity could account for individual differences in performance. Results showed significant individual differences, and high variability but no effect was found for the subjects' distance thresholds, although some of the variation in subject response time appears to be related to distance, gender and the cognitive factor of tolerance of ambiguity.

[1]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[4]  William R. Sherman,et al.  Understanding Virtual Reality , 2003 .

[5]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Carl Machover,et al.  Virtual reality , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Z. Pylyshyn Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  David Waller,et al.  Factors Affecting the Perception of Interobject Distances in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence.

[9]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994 .

[10]  Stephen J. Westerman,et al.  Individual differences in human-computer interaction , 1993 .

[11]  C. S. Green,et al.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players , 2006, Cognition.

[12]  L. Hettinger,et al.  Changes in the dark focus of accommodation associated with simulator sickness. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[14]  K. M. Dallenbach The Staircase-Method Critically Examined , 1966 .

[15]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Practical evaluations of real user company needs for visualization technologies , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  E. Johnston Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[19]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Accommodation and Apparent Distance , 1988, Perception.

[20]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  G. Mather,et al.  Blur Discrimination and its Relation to Blur-Mediated Depth Perception , 2002, Perception.

[22]  R. Fox,et al.  The effect of testing method on stereoanomaly , 1984, Vision Research.

[23]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  Whitman Richards,et al.  Stereopsis and stereoblindness , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  A S Eadie,et al.  Modelling adaptation effects in vergence and accommodation after exposure to a simulated Virtual Reality stimulus , 2000, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  David C Knill,et al.  Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[27]  S J Westerman,et al.  Individual differences in the use of depth cues: implications for computer- and video-based tasks. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[28]  James E. Cutting,et al.  HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND HUMAN VISION I , 2002 .

[29]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[30]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[31]  N. Qian Binocular Disparity and the Perception of Depth , 1997, Neuron.

[32]  R. R. Blake,et al.  Perception : an approach to personality , 1951 .

[33]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[34]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Health issues with virtual reality displays: what we do know and what we don't , 1997, COMG.

[35]  B Bridgeman,et al.  Dual adaptation and adaptive generalization of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Achieving Near-Correct Focus Cues Using Multiple Image Planes , 2004 .

[37]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[38]  Phillip G. Clampitt Managing Organizational Uncertainty : Conceptualization and Measurement , 2000 .

[39]  W. Charman,et al.  Age Changes in the Interactions between the Accommodation and Vergence Systems , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[40]  C D Stine,et al.  Vision and sports: a review of the literature. , 1982, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[41]  John Murray,et al.  Some perspectives on visual depth perception , 1994, COMG.

[42]  I. Howard Seeing in depth, Vol. 1: Basic mechanisms. , 2002 .

[43]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Getting the measure of vergence weight in nearness perception , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  T. Ichikawa,et al.  Egocentric Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments: Empirical Evaluation of Interaction Techniques , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[45]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  A curious illusion suggests complex cue interactions in distance perception , 1999 .

[46]  James A Crowell,et al.  Distortions of distance and shape are not produced by a single continuous transformation of reach space , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  A. Furnham A content, correlational and factor analytic study of four tolerance of ambiguity questionnaires , 1994 .

[48]  S K Rushton,et al.  Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[49]  J. Cutting,et al.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  M. Wraga Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  The Influence of Object Size and Surface Shape on Shape Constancy from Stereo , 2004, Perception.

[53]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  G P Bingham,et al.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Individual differences in virtual environments-introduction and overview , 2000 .

[57]  James T Todd,et al.  The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.

[59]  L L Kontsevich,et al.  Defaults in stereoscopic and kinetic depth perception , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Visual Perception of Location and Distance , 1996 .

[61]  E. Frenkel-Brunswik Personality theory and perception. , 1974, Psychological issues.

[62]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  The Perception of Distance in Simulated Visual Displays:A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Multiple Depth Cues Across Viewing Distances , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[63]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon , 2001, Nature.

[64]  C. D. Smock The relationship between intolerance of ambiguity, generalization and speed of perceptual closure. , 1957, Child development.

[65]  W. Epstein Recalibration by Pairing: A Process of Perceptual Learning , 1975, Perception.

[66]  Hunter G. Hoffman,et al.  Physically touching virtual objects using tactile augmentation enhances the realism of virtual environments , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[67]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses , 2002, Science.

[68]  M S Banks,et al.  Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision , 1975, Science.

[69]  S. Budner Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[70]  Jr. A. P. Mac Donald,et al.  Revised Scale for Ambiguity Tolerance: Reliability and Validity , 1970 .

[71]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Fish tank virtual reality , 1993, INTERCHI.

[72]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[73]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  W. Richards,et al.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[75]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[76]  R. Norton,et al.  Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. , 1975, Journal of personality assessment.

[77]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  S A Hitzeman,et al.  What the literature says about sports vision. , 1993, Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society.

[79]  R. Welch Perceptual modification : adapting to altered sensory environments / Robert B. Welch , 1978 .

[80]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[81]  A. Parker,et al.  Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture , 1993, Vision Research.

[82]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[83]  Robert D. McIntosh,et al.  Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for programming reaching: insights from visual form agnosia II (of III) , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[84]  Stine Cd,et al.  Vision and sports: a review of the literature. , 1982 .

[85]  William R. Sherman,et al.  Understanding Virtual RealityInterface, Application, and Design , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[86]  Yumi Kato,et al.  The use of video refraction to measure the dynamic properties of the near triad in observers of a 3‐D display , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[87]  Whitman Richards,et al.  A Planar and a Volumetric Test for Stereoanomaly , 2002, Perception.

[88]  Bettina Berendt,et al.  Investigating Distance Knowledge Using Virtual Environments , 2002 .

[89]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Design issues in virtual environment displays: a formal appraisal from the perspective of human perception , 1996 .

[90]  George Mather,et al.  Depth cue integration: stereopsis and image blur , 2000, Vision Research.

[91]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Elements of psychophysics , 1966 .

[92]  C. Kaernbach Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[93]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  What are virtual environments? , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[94]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[95]  Susan T. Rydell,et al.  Measurement and Some Correlates of Need-Cognition , 1966, Psychological reports.

[96]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Ordinal depth information from accommodation? , 2000, Ergonomics.

[97]  S Saito,et al.  Visual accommodation and subject performance during a stereographic object task using liquid crystal shutters. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[98]  Joseph Psotka,et al.  Effects of Field of View on Judgments of Self-Location: Distortions in Distance Estimations Even When the Image Geometry Exactly Fits the Field of View , 1998, Presence.

[99]  Randall C. Smith,et al.  Shared Vision , 2013, Team for Change: A Practitioner's Guide to Implementing Change in the Modern Workplace.

[100]  W. Shebilske Ecological efference mediation theory and motion perception during self-motion , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[101]  Roy Kalawsky,et al.  The science of virtual reality and virtual environments - a technical, scientific and engineering reference on virtual environments , 1993 .

[102]  I. Howard,et al.  Seeing in depth, Vol. 2: Depth perception. , 2002 .

[103]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Realizing the full potential of virtual reality: human factors issues that could stand in the way , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[104]  Ma Conway,et al.  Handbook of perception and cognition , 1996 .

[105]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Binocular vision: moving closer to reality , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[106]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[107]  J. Block,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between intolerance of ambiguity and ethnocentrism. , 1951, Journal of personality.

[108]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[109]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[110]  Frederick P. Brooks What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[111]  James F. Cremer,et al.  Distance perception in real and virtual environments , 2004 .

[112]  E. C. Regan Some evidence of adaptation to immersion in virtual reality , 1995 .

[113]  Louis B. Rosenberg The effect of interocular distance upon operator performance using stereoscopic displays to perform virtual depth tasks , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[114]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[115]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[116]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments , 2005, TAP.

[117]  W. Shebilske Extraretinal information in corrective saccades and inflow vs outflow theories of visual direction constancy , 1976, Vision Research.

[118]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User analysis in HCI - the historical lessons from individual differences research , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[119]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  A framework for considering the role of afference and efference in the control and perception of ocular position , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[120]  E. Frenkel-Brunswik,et al.  Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. , 1949, Psychological issues.

[121]  M. Kirton A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity. , 1981, Journal of personality assessment.

[122]  John N. Latta,et al.  A conceptual virtual reality model , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[123]  Mj Sinai,et al.  Egocentric Distance Perception in a Virutal Environment Using a Perceptual Matching Task , 1999 .

[124]  D. Massaro Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[125]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[126]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception , 1999, Perception.

[127]  J. Todd Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.3 March 2004 The visual perception of 3D shape q , 2022 .

[128]  Robert G. Eggleston,et al.  Virtual reality system effects on size-distance judgements in a virtual environment , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[129]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  Size-Constancy in the CAVE , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.