Enhancing Access to Situational Vocabulary by Leveraging Geographic Context.

Users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) aids could benefit from novel methods for accelerating access to contextually relevant vocabulary. This paper describes our initial efforts toward improving access to situational vocabulary through the use of geographic context to predict vocabulary. A corpus of spoken data produced by one able-bodied male speaker across various locations was collected and used to mine location-specific vocabulary clusters. We describe the data mining algorithm and illustrate how context-driven vocabulary organization and prediction can be integrated into an iconic communication system. Correlations between user and algorithmgenerated vocabulary patterns highlight discrepancies between actual versus perceived frequency statistics. Thus, device customization may be achieved through a hybrid humanalgorithmic approach to vocabulary selection. Endowing the communication aid with knowledge about the user’s location-specific vocabulary patterns may help to balance the burden of communication between the system and the user to yield substantial gains in accessing situationally appropriate vocabulary which may in turn accelerate communication rate.

[1]  S. Hunnicutt.  Lexical Prediction for A Text-to-Speech System , 1986 .

[2]  Gregory W. Lesher.  DOMAIN-SPECIFIC WORD PREDICTION FOR AUGMENTATIVE COMMUNICATION , 2001 .

[3]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Prediction and conversational momentum in an augmentative communication system , 1992, CACM.

[4]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  A localized algorithm for parallel association mining , 1997, SPAA '97.

[5]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Influence of length of augmented message on children's attitudes toward Peers who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2000 .

[6]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Effect of the “PAL” word prediction system on the quality and quantity of text generation , 1992 .

[7]  B R Baker,et al.  Using images to generate speech , 1986 .

[8]  Simon P. Levine,et al.  Modeling the speed of text entry with a word prediction interface , 1994 .

[9]  Frieda Goldman Eisler.  Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[10]  Janice C Light,et al.  Message-encoding techniques for augmentative communication systems: the recall performances of adults with severe speech impairments. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  D. Beukelman,et al.  An elementary student with severe expressive communication impairment in a general education classroom: Sequential analysis of interactions , 2000 .

[12]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Communication and handicap : aspects of psychological compensation and technical aids , 1986 .

[13]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative communication , 1996 .

[14]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[15]  Gregory W. Lesher,et al.  Techniques for augmenting scanning communication , 1998 .

[16]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2000 .

[17]  Elizabeth Allen,et al.  Comparison of speed and accuracy for selected electronic communication devices and input methods , 1993 .

[18]  Teresa Iacono,et al.  A few well-chosen words , 1998 .

[19]  Teresa Iacono,et al.  Crews,Wusses, and Whoppas: core and fringe vocabularies of Australian meal-break conversations in the workplace , 1999 .

[20]  David W. Conrath,et al.  Semantic Similarity Based on Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy , 1997, ROCLING/IJCLCLP.

[21]  Michael Beigl,et al.  A Location Model for Communicating and Processing of Context , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  H H Koester,et al.  Learning and performance of able-bodied individuals using scanning systems with and without word prediction. , 1994, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[23]  H. S. Venkatagiri,et al.  Effect of window size on rate of communication in a lexical prediction AAC system , 1994 .

[24]  Petra Perner,et al.  Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[25]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures , 2004 .

[26]  Teresa Iacono,et al.  Topics of meal-break conversations , 1998 .

[27]  Sarah W. Blackstone,et al.  Augmentative communication : an introduction , 1986 .

[28]  Mathijs Soede,et al.  Statistical disambiguation of multi-character keys applied to reduce motor requirements for augmentative and alternative communication , 1987 .

[29]  C. Shewan,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[30]  Eve Müller,et al.  Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: variations across partners , 2002 .

[31]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Adaptive and predictive techniques in a communication prosthesis , 1987 .

[32]  P. Parnes,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I—discourse patterns , 1985 .

[33]  D. Jeffery Higginbotham,et al.  Evaluation of keystroke savings across five assistive communication technologies , 1992 .

[34]  Ann Copestake.  Augmented and alternative NLP techniques for augmentative and alternative communication , 1997, Workshop On Natural Language Processing For Communication Aids.

[35]  Christian Borgelt,et al.  EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATIONS OF APRIORI AND ECLAT , 2003 .

[36]  Linda A. Hoag,et al.  Variables affecting perceptions of social aspects of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user , 1994 .

[37]  P Demasco.  Human factors considerations in the design of language interfaces in AAC. , 1994, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[38]  Deb Roy,et al.  Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits , 2006 .

[39]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[40]  Katy Radochonski,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication (AAC) - An Overview , 2007 .

[41]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts , 2004, NAACL.

[42]  Wilson Ms,et al.  Computer technology. Emerging technology meets universal grammar. , 1993 .

[43]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[44]  Rupal Patel,et al.  Beyond Linear Syntax: An Image-Oriented Communication Aid. , 2004 .