Genomic analyses of patients with unexplained early onset scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN To test for rare genetic mutations, a cohort of patients with unexplained early onset scoliosis (EOS) was screened using high-density microarray genotyping. A cohort of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was similarly screened, and the results were compared. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patients with scoliosis in infancy or early childhood (EOS) are at high risk for progressive deformity and associated problems including respiratory compromise. EOS is frequently associated with genetic disorders, but many patients present with non-specific clinical features and without an associated diagnosis. We hypothesized that EOS in these patients may be caused by rare genetic mutations detectable by next-generation genomic methods. METHODS We ascertained 24 patients with unexplained EOS from pediatric orthopedic clinics. We genotyped them, along with 39 connecting family members, using the Illumina OmniExpress-12 v1.0 beadchip. Resulting genotypes were analyzed for chromosomal changes, specifically copy number variation (CNV) and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). We screened 482 AIS patients and 744 healthy controls, which were similarly genotyped with the same beadchip, for chromosomal changes identified in the EOS cohort. RESULTS Copy number variation (CNV) and absence of heterozygosity (AOH) analyses revealed a genetic diagnosis of chromosome 15q24 microdeletion syndrome in one patient, and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 in a second patient. Prior genetic testing and clinical evaluations had been negative in both cases. A large novel chromosome 10 deletion was likely causal in a third EOS patient. These mutations identified in the EOS patients were absent in AIS patients and controls, and thus not associated with AIS or found in asymptomatic individuals. CONCLUSIONS Our data underscore the utility of updated genetic evaluations including high-density microarray-based genotyping and other "next-generation" methods in patients with unexplained EOS, even where prior genetic studies were negative. These data also suggest the intriguing possibility that other mutations detectable by whole genome sequencing, as well as epigenetic effects, await discovery in the EOS population.

[1]  B. Akbarnia The Growing Spine: Management of Spinal Disorders in Young Children , 2014 .

[2]  C. Wise,et al.  The impact of large-scale genomic methods in orthopaedic disorders: insights from genome-wide association studies. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Allyn McConkie-Rosell,et al.  The utility of the traditional medical genetics diagnostic evaluation in the context of next-generation sequencing for undiagnosed genetic disorders , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  D. Knapp,et al.  Mortality and Morbidity in Early-Onset Scoliosis Surgery , 2013, Spine.

[5]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  A Mechanism for Gene-Environment Interaction in the Etiology of Congenital Scoliosis , 2012, Cell.

[6]  Todd A. Johnson,et al.  A genome-wide association study identifies common variants near LBX1 associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[7]  L. Karol Early Definitive Spinal Fusion in Young Children: What We Have Learned , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  H. Hakonarson,et al.  Genome-wide association studies of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis suggest candidate susceptibility genes. , 2011, Human molecular genetics.

[9]  Leslie G Biesecker,et al.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  M. Kubota,et al.  Maternal uniparental disomy 14 syndrome demonstrates prader-willi syndrome-like phenotype. , 2009, The Journal of pediatrics.

[11]  J. Andrieux,et al.  Genotype–phenotype correlation in four 15q24 deleted patients identified by array‐CGH , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[12]  M. Giroud,et al.  Multiple cysts of the corpus callosum and psychomotor delay in a patient with a 3.1 Mb 15q24.1q24.2 interstitial deletion identified by array‐CGH , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[13]  Z. Ou,et al.  Redefined genomic architecture in 15q24 directed by patient deletion/duplication breakpoint mapping , 2009, Human Genetics.

[14]  H. Van Esch,et al.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is part of the new 15q24 microdeletion syndrome. , 2009, European journal of medical genetics.

[15]  Igor Rudan,et al.  Runs of homozygosity in European populations. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  A. Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Molecular mechanisms regulating phenotypic outcome in paternal and maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 14 , 2008, Epigenetics.

[17]  A. Slavotinek Novel microdeletion syndromes detected by chromosome microarrays , 2008, Human Genetics.

[18]  A. Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Deletions and epimutations affecting the human 14q32.2 imprinted region in individuals with paternal and maternal upd(14)-like phenotypes , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[19]  J. Herring Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopaedics , 2007 .

[20]  D. Horn,et al.  A further case of the recurrent 15q24 microdeletion syndrome, detected by array CGH , 2007, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[21]  D. Mackay,et al.  Isolated imprinting mutation of the DLK1/GTL2 locus associated with a clinical presentation of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 , 2007, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[22]  B. D. de Vries,et al.  Characterization of a recurrent 15q24 microdeletion syndrome. , 2007, Human molecular genetics.

[23]  B. Akbarnia Management themes in early onset scoliosis. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  A. Cherry,et al.  A report of three patients with an interstitial deletion of chromosome 15q24 , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[25]  C. Sotelo,et al.  The Slit Receptor Rig-1/Robo3 Controls Midline Crossing by Hindbrain Precerebellar Neurons and Axons , 2004, Neuron.

[26]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Mutations in a Human ROBO Gene Disrupt Hindbrain Axon Pathway Crossing and Morphogenesis , 2004, Science.

[27]  O. Marín,et al.  Slit Proteins Prevent Midline Crossing and Determine the Dorsoventral Position of Major Axonal Pathways in the Mammalian Forebrain , 2002, Neuron.

[28]  J. Bressler,et al.  Imprinting in Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes. , 1998, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  E. Zackai,et al.  Maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 14. , 1991, Journal of medical genetics.

[30]  Ruth Wynne-Davies Infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Causative factors, particularly in the first six months of life. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.