Journey-to-Crime Distances of Residential Burglars in China Disentangled: Origin and Destination Effects

Research on journey-to-crime distance has revealed the importance of both the characteristics of the offender as well as those of target communities. However, the effect of the home community has so far been ignored. Besides, almost all journey-to-crime studies were done in Western societies, and little is known about how the distinct features of communities in major Chinese cities shape residential burglars’ travel patterns. To fill this gap, we apply a cross-classified multilevel regression model on data of 3763 burglary trips in ZG City, one of the bustling metropolises in China. This allows us to gain insight into how residential burglars’ journey-to-crime distances are shaped by their individual-level characteristics as well as those of their home and target communities. Results show that the characteristics of the home community have larger effects than those of target communities, while individual-level features are most influential. Older burglars travel over longer distances to commit their burglaries than the younger ones. Offenders who commit their burglaries in groups tend to travel further than solo offenders. Burglars who live in communities with a higher average rent, a denser road network and a higher percentage of local residents commit their burglaries at shorter distances. Communities with a denser road network attract burglars from a longer distance, whereas those with a higher percentage of local residents attract them from shorter by.

[1]  A. Wheeler.  The Moving Home Effect: A Quasi Experiment Assessing Effect of Home Location on the Offence Location , 2012 .

[2]  D. Rossmo,et al.  How Far to Travel? A Multilevel Analysis of the Residence-to-Crime Distance , 2015 .

[3]  Woodrow W. Nichols,et al.  Urban Structure and Criminal Mobility , 1976 .

[4]  W. Bernasco,et al.  The Oxford handbook of offender decision making , 2017 .

[5]  Danielle M. Reynald,et al.  Do Social Barriers Affect Urban Crime Trips? The Effects of Ethnic and Economic Neighbourhood Compositions on the Flow of Crime in The Hague, The Netherlands , 2008 .

[6]  Alyssa W. Chamberlain,et al.  Relative Difference and Burglary Location , 2016 .

[7]  L. Pettiway.  Copping crack: The travel behavior of crack users , 1995 .

[8]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  Disaggregating the Journey to Homicide , 2005 .

[9]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Road Structure and Burglary Risk Via Quantitative Network Analysis , 2015 .

[10]  Richard Block,et al.  The Journey to Crime: Victims and Offenders Converge in Violent Index Offences in Chicago , 2007 .

[11]  Pamela Wilcox,et al.  Crime-Reduction Effects of Open-street CCTV: Conditionality Considerations , 2017 .

[12]  T. S. Smith,et al.  Inverse Distance Variations for the Flow of Crime in Urban Areas , 1976 .

[13]  Jianguo Chen,et al.  Spatial Variation Relationship between Floating Population and Residential Burglary: A Case Study from ZG, China , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[14]  N. Levine,et al.  Journey-to-Crime by Gender and Age Group in Manchester, England , 2013 .

[15]  Martin A. Andresen,et al.  Age and the distance to crime , 2014 .

[16]  E. Lambert,et al.  Correlates of informal social control in Guangzhou, China neighborhoods , 2010 .

[17]  K. Land,et al.  Social Ties, Collective Efficacy and Perceived Neighborhood Property Crime in Guangzhou, China , 2013 .

[18]  Brent Snook,et al.  Individual differences in distance travelled by serial burglars , 2004 .

[19]  W. Bernasco,et al.  Theft from the person in urban China: assessing the diurnal effects of opportunity and social ecology , 2018, Habitat International.

[20]  R. Clarke,et al.  The Reasoning Criminal , 2014 .

[21]  Dong-Kyu Kim,et al.  Cross-classified multilevel models for severity of commercial motor vehicle crashes considering heterogeneity among companies and regions. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Notes on the Geometry of Crime , 2017 .

[23]  P. Brantingham,et al.  Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment , 1993 .

[24]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  PERSONAL CAPITAL AND SOCIAL CONTROL: THE DETERRENCE IMPLICATIONS OF A THEORY OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN CRIMINAL OFFENDING* , 1994 .

[25]  B. Portnov,et al.  Distance decay function in criminal behavior: a case of Israel , 2007 .

[26]  Luzi Xiao,et al.  Examining the relationship between neighborhood environment and residential locations of juvenile and adult migrant burglars in China , 2018, Cities.

[27]  C. Vandeviver,et al.  What Makes Long Crime Trips Worth Undertaking? Balancing Costs and Benefits in Burglars’ Journey to Crime , 2015 .

[28]  Trevor Bennett,et al.  Burglars on Burglary: Prevention and the Offender , 1984 .

[29]  R. Clarke,et al.  Explaining High-Risk Concentrations of Crime in the City , 2014 .

[30]  D. Kim Rossmo,et al.  Geographic Profiling , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[31]  Robert S. Stawski,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd Edition) , 2013 .

[32]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  DISTANCE DECAY REEXAMINED , 1999 .

[33]  Robert W. J. Jansen,et al.  THE ROAD TO THE ROBBERYTravel Patterns in Commercial Robberies , 1998 .

[34]  W. Bernasco,et al.  How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas?: A New Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Location Choice , 2005 .

[35]  Ralph B. Taylor,et al.  Need drugs, will travel?: The distances to crime of illegal drug buyers , 2013 .

[36]  Jin Wang,et al.  Correlates of formal and informal social/crime control in China: An exploratory study , 2007 .

[37]  T. Neutens,et al.  A discrete spatial choice model of burglary target selection at the house-level , 2015 .

[38]  J. Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[39]  Peter J. van Koppen,et al.  DESISTING DISTANCE DECAY: ON THE AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL CRIME TRIPS* , 1997 .

[40]  Aiden Sidebottom,et al.  ALL OFFENDERS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS: VARIATION IN JOURNEYS TO CRIME BETWEEN OFFENDERS* , 2010 .

[41]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  ON AMBIGUITY IN PERCEPTIONS OF RISK:IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL DECISION MAKING AND DETERRENCE* , 2011 .

[42]  Woodrow W. Nichols.  10. Mental Maps, Social Characteristics, and Criminal Mobility , 1980 .

[43]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Social and spatial differentiation of high and low income groups’ out-of-home activities in Guangzhou, China , 2015 .

[44]  Marie-Noële Royer,et al.  Criminal Mobility and Criminal Achievement , 2008 .

[45]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of the Risk of Household Burglary in the City of Tianjin, China , 2007 .

[46]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[47]  Robert W. J. Jansen,et al.  THE ROAD TO THE ROBBERY Travel Patterns in Commercial Robberies , 1998 .

[48]  C. Foster,et al.  Age differences in the association of childhood obesity with area-level and school-level deprivation: cross-classified multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data , 2012, International Journal of Obesity.

[49]  Stijn Van Daele,et al.  Outbound offending: The journey to crime and crime sprees , 2011 .

[50]  Hannah Fry,et al.  ROLE OF THE STREET NETWORK IN BURGLARS' SPATIAL DECISION-MAKING† , 2017 .

[51]  Lynn A. Addington,et al.  Keeping the Barbarians Outside the Gate? Comparing Burglary Victimization in Gated and Non-Gated Communities , 2015 .

[52]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Efficient Analysis of Mixed Hierarchical and Cross-Classified Random Structures Using a Multilevel Model , 1994 .

[53]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Does the Configuration of the Street Network Influence Where Outdoor Serious Violence Takes Place? Using Space Syntax to Test Crime Pattern Theory , 2017 .