Interaural self-motion linear velocity thresholds are shifted by roll vection

The otolith organs respond equivalently to changes in gravitational force due to head tilt and to changes in inertial force due to linear acceleration. It has been shown that the central nervous system (CNS) uses internal models of the laws of physics to distinguish tilt from translation. Models with these internal models predict that illusory tilt, if large enough, will be accompanied by an illusion of linear motion. To investigate this prediction, we measured interaural, self-motion, direction-detection thresholds in darkness and with roll optokinetic stimulation. Each lateral translation consisted of a single cycle of sinusoidal acceleration, after which subjects indicated whether they translated to the left or right. We found that the interaural direction-detection threshold measured during clockwise and counterclockwise optokinetic stimulation shifted in opposite directions relative to thresholds in darkness. Using a generalized linear model, we determined that this finding was statistically significant (P < 0.005) and is consistent with the prediction that illusory tilt should be accompanied by a non-zero neural estimate of linear velocity that, if large enough (supra-threshold), contributes to translation perception.

[1]  L. Young,et al.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[2]  Daniel M. Merfeld,et al.  Influence of Rotational Cues on the Neural Processing of Gravito-Inertial Force , 2003 .

[3]  F. O. Black,et al.  Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during Translation and Tilt. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Spatial orientation of VOR to combined vestibular stimuli in squirrel monkeys. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[5]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Daniel M Merfeld,et al.  Human ocular torsion and perceived roll responses to linear acceleration. , 2005, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[7]  L. Harris,et al.  Levels of Perception , 2013, Springer New York.

[8]  L. Young,et al.  The vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  A. J. Benson,et al.  Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[11]  R. Peterka,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. I. Influence of the semicircular canals following post-rotatory tilt. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Collett,et al.  Modeling Binary Data. , 1993 .

[13]  S Glasauer Interaction of Semicircular Canals and Otoliths in the Processing Structure of the Subjective Zenith , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  C Wall,et al.  Effects of static orientation upon human optokinetic afternystagmus. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  R. Held,et al.  Moving Visual Scenes Influence the Apparent Direction of Gravity , 1972, Science.

[16]  Fred W. Mast,et al.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Daniel M Merfeld,et al.  Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. V. Van Gisbergen,et al.  Verticality perception during off-vertical axis rotation. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Peterka,et al.  Origin of orientation-dependent asymmetries in vestibulo-ocular reflexes evoked by caloric stimulation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  L. Young,et al.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response? , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[22]  Dora E. Angelaki,et al.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion , 2004, Nature.

[23]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  D. Merfeld Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  M Rocchetti,et al.  Enantioselective recognition of two anticonvulsants, FCE 26743 and FCE 28073, by MAO, and relationship between MAO-B inhibition and FCE 26743 concentrations in rat brain. , 1995, Progress in brain research.

[27]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[28]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.