An Anatomical Equivalence Class Based Joint Transformation-Residual Descriptor for Morphological Analysis

Existing approaches to computational anatomy assume that a perfectly conforming diffeomorphism applied to an anatomy of interest captures its morphological characteristics relative to a template. However, biological variability renders this task extremely difficult, if possible at all in many cases. Consequently, the information not reflected by the transformation, is lost permanently from subsequent analysis. We establish that this residual information is highly significant for characterizing subtle morphological variations and is complementary to the transformation. The amount of residual, in turn, depends on transformation parameters, such as its degree of regularization as well as on the template. We, therefore, present a methodology that measures morphological characteristics via a lossless morphological descriptor, based on both the residual and the transformation. Since there are infinitely many [transformation, residual] pairs that reconstruct a given anatomy, which collectively form a nonlinear manifold embedded in a high-dimensional space, we treat them as members of an Anatomical Equivalence Class (AEC). A unique and optimal representation, according to a certain criterion, of each individual anatomy is then selected from the corresponding AEC, by solving an optimization problem. This process effectively determines the optimal template and transformation parameters for each individual anatomy, and removes respective confounding variation in the data. Based on statistical tests on synthetic 2D images and real 3D brain scans with simulated atrophy, we show that this approach provides significant improvement over descriptors based solely on a transformation, in addition to being nearly independent of the choice of the template.

[1]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry Using the RAVENS Maps: Methods and Validation Using Simulated Longitudinal Atrophy , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Anatomical Equivalence Class: A Morphological Analysis Framework Using a Lossless Shape Descriptor , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Identifying Global Anatomical Differences: Deformation-Based Morphometry , 1998, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. Baron,et al.  Mapping gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild cognitive impairment , 2002, Neuroreport.

[7]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Growth patterns in the developing brain detected by using continuum mechanical tensor maps , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Group Actions, Homeomorphisms, and Matching: A General Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Unified Statistical Approach to Deformation-Based Morphometry , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  GROWTH PATTERNS IN THE DEVELOPING HUMAN BRAIN DETECTED USING CONTINUUM-MECHANICAL TENSOR MAPPING , 1999 .

[14]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  A deformable neuroanatomy textbook based on viscous uid mechanics , 1993 .

[15]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical methods in computational anatomy , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[16]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Simulation of tissue atrophy using a topology preserving transformation model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.