A New Measure of Accessibility based on Perceived Opportunities

Accessibility is a key concept in describing and simulating the interactions between activities and transportation in any given area. Over the decades several definitions and related indicators have been proposed for accessibility including opportunity-based and utility-based, active and passive, descriptive and behavioral ones. Limitations of the various definitions and related indicators have been discussed in the literature on the basis of their lack of behavioral content and/or lack of clear physical meaning and/or the lack of sound statistical procedures to estimate the parameters involved. In this paper a new behavioral definition of accessibility, both active and passive, is proposed and tested, based on the number of opportunities perceived by an (average) individual for satisfying his/her needs in the study area. These general definition overcomes most shortcomings of previous definitions belonging to the same class such as isochrones-based measures which, in turn, can be cast as particular cases of perceived opportunities measures.

[1]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice models with latent choice sets , 1995 .

[2]  D. R. Ingram.  The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form , 1971 .

[3]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis: Models and Applications , 2009 .

[4]  G. Leonardi.  Optimum Facility Location by Accessibility Maximizing , 1978 .

[5]  S. Hanson.  GETTING THERE: URBAN TRANSPORTATION IN CONTEXT. , 1995 .

[6]  Armando Cartenì,et al.  An activity-based approach for complex travel behaviour modelling , 2010 .

[7]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[8]  M. Wachs,et al.  PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY AS A SOCIAL INDICATOR , 1973 .

[9]  Andrea Papola,et al.  Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand , 2001 .

[10]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[11]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility , 2006 .

[12]  L. Burns.  Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility , 1979 .

[13]  Scott A. Bridwell,et al.  A Field-Based Theory for Time Geography , 2009 .

[14]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[15]  M. Kwan.  Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[16]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Gordon Pirie,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal , 1979 .

[18]  H. Miller.  Place‐Based versus People‐Based Geographic Information Science , 2007 .

[19]  Dirk Van Oudheusden,et al.  The accessibility of nodes in the Belgian road network , 1978 .

[20]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Section 7.5 - Dynamic traffic assignment with non separable link cost functions and queue spillovers , 2009 .

[21]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS , 1998 .