Ranking sustainable suppliers using congestion approach of data envelopment analysis

Abstract Selecting sustainable suppliers is one of the important tasks of decision makers to survive in today's competitive businesses. One of the uses of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is to provide improvement solutions (benchmarks) for inefficient decision making units (DMUs). In classical DEA models, improvement solutions are merely proposed by one of the triple approaches including input-oriented, output-oriented, and hybrid approaches. However, based on the congestion approach of the “theory of economies of scale”, in some cases, the benchmarks derived from the triple approaches are not sufficiently precise. In “theory of economies of scale”, sometimes with an increase in inputs we see more increment in outputs (Wei and Yan, 2004). This means that the triple approaches do not consider all contributing factors of inefficiencies of DMUs. In other words, the triple approaches overlook the shortage of congested inputs as an inefficiency reason of DMUs. Focusing solely on triple approaches cannot always be correct given that sometimes inefficiency reason for some DMUs is due to a shortage of inputs. The objective of this paper, accordingly, is to consider congestion approach (congested inputs) in evaluations of DMUs. To do so, we propose a novel DEA model to show that an increase in congested inputs may lead to higher outputs/efficiency. By so doing, the reliability of improvement solutions are increased. Here, a DEA model is developed to assess the sustainability of suppliers. Also, the congestion of DMUs is detected in pairwise comparisons. A case study is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the presented model.

[1]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An integrated location-inventory-routing humanitarian supply chain network with pre- and post-disaster management considerations , 2017, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

[2]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Using DEA to Identify and Manage Congestion , 2004 .

[3]  G. Jahanshahloo,et al.  Review of the methods for evaluating congestion in DEA and computing output losses due to congestion , 2014 .

[4]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Recognizing strong and weak congestion slack based in data envelopment analysis , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Making an ideal decision-making unit using virtual network data envelopment analysis approach , 2014 .

[6]  Lei Wen,et al.  Sustainable Supplier Evaluation Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Group Decision Methods , 2013 .

[7]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  DEA congestion and returns to scale under an occurrence of multiple optimal projections , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Evaluating and ranking sustainable suppliers by robust dynamic data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[9]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A hybrid goal programming and dynamic data envelopment analysis framework for sustainable supplier evaluation , 2016, Neural Computing and Applications.

[10]  David O. Allen,et al.  Congestion in the Chinese automobile and textile industries revisited , 2009 .

[11]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Future planning for benchmarking and ranking sustainable suppliers using goal programming and robust double frontiers DEA , 2017 .

[12]  Patrick Van Cayseele,et al.  Cost efficiency in the European securities settlement and depository industry. , 2007 .

[13]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[14]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  A robust fuzzy possibilistic programming for a new network GP-DEA model to evaluate sustainable supply chains , 2017 .

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Degree of scale economies and congestion: A unified DEA approach , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Market entity behavior of Chinese state-owned enterprises , 1998 .

[17]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Forecasting efficiency of green suppliers by dynamic data envelopment analysis and artificial neural networks , 2017 .

[18]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A novel bidirectional network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating sustainability of distributive supply chains of transport companies , 2018 .

[19]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Efficiency Models in Data Envelopment Analysis: Techniques of Evaluation of Productivity of Firms in a Growing Economy , 2006 .

[20]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Efficiency Models in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006 .

[22]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Supplier selection in the presence of dual-role factors, non-discretionary inputs and weight restrictions , 2011 .

[23]  Juha Tarkka,et al.  Economies of Scale and Technological Development in Securities Depository and Settlement Systems , 2002 .

[24]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi DEA Implications of Congestion , 2003 .

[25]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Selecting the best supply chain by goal programming and network data envelopment analysis , 2015, RAIRO Oper. Res..

[26]  W. Cooper,et al.  A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA , 2000 .

[27]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  How to evaluate sustainability of supply chains? A dynamic network DEA approach , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[28]  R. Färe,et al.  Congestion of Production Factors , 1980 .

[29]  Hong Yan,et al.  Congestion and returns to scale in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  R. Färe,et al.  Measuring congestion in production , 1983 .

[31]  Guoliang Yang,et al.  Negative data in DEA: Recognizing congestion and specifying the least and the most congested decision making units , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  Performance Benchmarking For Taiwan’s International Tourist Hotels , 2006 .

[33]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[34]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[35]  Fanyong Meng,et al.  Interval cross efficiency for fully ranking decision making units using DEA/AHP approach , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..