EFFECT OF FOOD AND PREDATORS ON THE ACTIVITY OF FOUR LARVAL RANID FROGS

When animals are more active they encounter both more food and more predators. Thus, activity rates mediate a trade-off between growth rates and predation risk. Models of the trade-off generally, but not exclusively, predict reduced activity when re- source availability increases or when predation risk increases. In a laboratory setting, we videotaped larvae of four species of ranid frogs (bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana; green frog, R. clamitans; leopard frog, R. pipiens; and wood frog, R. sylvatica). Changes in activity level in response to changes in food and predator density were measured. Overall, species reduced both the proportion of time active and swimming speed with increases in resource level and predator density. These effects were additive. Regardless of food level, additional predators reduced activity levels similar amounts in all four species. Larger animals, which are less vulnerable to predation, were more active than smaller animals. Leopard frog and wood frog larvae, which are characteristic of more temporary waters, responded more strongly to variation in food levels than did bullfrog and green frog larvae.

[1]  E. Werner,et al.  Multiple predator effects on size‐dependent behavior and mortality of two species of anuran larvae , 2000 .

[2]  David K. Skelly,et al.  LONG-TERM DISTRIBUTIONAL DYNAMICS OF A MICHIGAN AMPHIBIAN ASSEMBLAGE , 1999 .

[3]  E. Werner,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE RELATION BETWEEN PREDATOR-INDUCED BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH PERFORMANCE IN LARVAL ANURANS , 1999 .

[4]  E. Werner,et al.  Influence of Forest Canopy Cover on the Breeding Pond Distributions of Several Amphibian Species , 1999 .

[5]  R. Relyea,et al.  Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles , 1998 .

[6]  D. Wilson,et al.  Optimal Foraging, Specialization, and a Solution to Liem's Paradox , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[7]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Individual Behavior and Community Dynamics , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[8]  S. L. Lima.  Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[9]  Phenotypic plasticity in larval anurans. , 1998 .

[10]  E. Werner,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY INDUCED PHENOTYPES IN TADPOLES , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  S. Peacor,et al.  TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN A SIMPLE AQUATIC FOOD WEB , 1997 .

[12]  J. Arendt,et al.  Adaptive Intrinsic Growth Rates: An Integration Across Taxa , 1997, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  E. Werner,et al.  MECHANISMS CREATING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ACROSS A FRESHWATER HABITAT GRADIENT , 1996 .

[14]  E. Werner,et al.  Factors modifying antipredator behavior in larval toads , 1996 .

[15]  J. Van Buskirk,et al.  COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A PREDATOR‐INDUCED POLYPHENISM IN THE GRAY TREEFROG HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  W. Sutherland.  From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[17]  E. Werner,et al.  Predator-induced behavioral indirect effects: consequences to competitive interactions in anuran larvae , 1996 .

[18]  E. Werner,et al.  Interaction Between Food Availability and Predation Mortality Mediated by Adaptive Behavior , 1995 .

[19]  P. Abrams.  Implications of Dynamically Variable Traits for Identifying, Classifying, and Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[20]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Short Term Refuge Use and Stability of Predator-Prey Models , 1995 .

[21]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The Effect of a Change in Foraging Options on Intake Rate and Predation Rate , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[22]  P. Abrams,et al.  The effect of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators , 1993 .

[23]  A. Houston,et al.  General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation , 1993 .

[24]  E. Werner,et al.  Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[25]  P. Abrams.  Why Predation Rate Should Not be Proportional to Predator Density , 1993 .

[26]  A. Abrams.  Indirect effects arising from optimal foraging , 1993 .

[27]  E. Werner.  Individual Behavior and Higher-Order Species Interactions , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[28]  I. Holopainen,et al.  Piscivory and Recruitment: Mechanisms Structuring Prey Populations in Small Lakes , 1992 .

[29]  E. Werner.  Competitive interactions between wood frog and northern leopard frog larvae : the influence of size and activity , 1992 .

[30]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Strengths of Indirect Effects Generated by Optimal Foraging , 1991 .

[31]  E. Werner.  Nonlethal Effects of a Predator on Competitive Interactions Between Two Anuran Larvae , 1991 .

[32]  P. Abrams.  Life History and the Relationship Between Food Availability and Foraging Effort , 1991 .

[33]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR ON THE TYPE-2 FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE' , 1990 .

[34]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[35]  M. McPeek,et al.  Predation Risk and The Foraging Behavior of Competing Stream Insects , 1989 .

[36]  R. Wassersug.  Locomotion in Amphibian Larvae (or “Why Aren't Tadpoles Built Like Fishes?”) , 1989 .

[37]  A. Houston,et al.  Starvation and Predation as Factors Limiting Population Size , 1987 .

[38]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Antipredator Behavior and the Population Dynamics of Simple Predator-Prey Systems , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[39]  R. Dunbrack,et al.  Adaptive Responses to Accelerating Costs of Movement: A Bioenergetic Basis for the Type-III Functional Response , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Prey refuges and predator prey stability , 1987 .

[41]  J. Speakman.  The optimum search speed of terrestrial predators when feeding on sedentary prey: a predictive model , 1986 .

[42]  J. Travis,et al.  The role of relative body size in a predator-prey relationship between dragonfly naliads and larval anurans , 1985 .

[43]  E. Werner,et al.  THE ONTOGENETIC NICHE AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[44]  Robert P. Gendron,et al.  A Laboratory Simulation of Foraging Behavior: The Effect of Search Rate on the Probability of Detecting Prey , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[46]  D. J. Hall,et al.  An Experimental Test of the Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Use in Fish , 1983 .

[47]  E. Brodie,et al.  Prey size preference of predators: differential vulnerability of larval anurans. , 1983 .

[48]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[49]  P. Abrams.  Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[50]  R. Norberg,et al.  Optimal Flight Speed in Birds when Feeding Young , 1981 .

[51]  H. Wilbur,et al.  Breeding habits and habitats of the amphibians of the Edwin S. George Reserve, Michigan, with notes on the local distribution of fishes , 1979 .

[52]  J. Gerritsen,et al.  Encounter Probabilities and Community Structure in Zooplankton: a Mathematical Model , 1977 .

[53]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Behavioral Response of Crayfish to a Fish Predator , 1976 .

[54]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  The Dynamics of Nutrient Limitation of Phytoplankton Algae: A Model Reconsidered , 1974 .

[55]  K. Gosner,et al.  A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification , 1960 .

[56]  J. G. Skellam.  The Mathematical Foundations Underlying the Use of Line Transects in Animal Ecology , 1958 .