Why IS ‘be’ appear there?: Topic marker vs. underdeveloped functional category
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Helmut Zobl,et al. Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition , 1989 .
[2] Kitaek Kim. Overgenerated be from Topic Marker toVerbal Inflection , 2011 .
[3] B. Levin. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .
[4] 안성호,et al. A Note on the Topic-Comment Stage in Korean EFL Syntactic Development , 2003 .
[5] Noam Chomsky. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .
[6] 신정선. Functional category acquisition by Korean EFL learners : the role of UG in foreign language learning , 2000 .
[7] Virginia Yip,et al. Interlanguage and learnability , 1995 .
[8] Tania Ionin,et al. Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English , 2002 .
[9] 한혜령. UG availability to Korean EFL learners : a longitudinal study of different age groups , 2000 .
[10] W. Rutherford,et al. Discourse Function and Language Transfer , 1979 .