Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia

We examine the multiscale influence of environmental and hydrological features of the riverine landscape on spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages in eastern Australia. Multiresponse artificial neural network models provided accurate predictions of fish assemblages in the Mary River based on species presence-absence data (mean Bray-Curtis similarity between predicted and observed composition = 84%) but were less accurate when based on spe- cies relative abundance or biomass (mean similarity = 62% and 59%, respectively). Landscape- and local-scale habitat variables (e.g., catchment area and riparian canopy cover) and characteristics of the long-term flow regime (e.g., vari- ability and predictability of flows) were more important predictors of fish assemblages than variables describing the short-term history of hydrological events. The relative importance of these variables was broadly similar for predicting species occurrence, relative abundance, or biomass. The transferability of the Mary River predictive models to the nearby Albert River was high for species presence-absence (i.e., closer match between predicted and observed data) compared with species abundances or biomass. This suggests that the same landscape-scale features are important de- terminants of distribution of individual species in both rivers but that interactions between landscape, hydrology, and local habitat features that collectively determine abundance and biomass may differ.

[1]  Russell G. Death,et al.  An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data , 2004 .

[2]  MARY E. POWER,et al.  Linking Scales in Stream Ecology , 2006 .

[3]  A. Arthington,et al.  Freshwater Fishes of North-Eastern Australia , 2004 .

[4]  J. Allan,et al.  FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF STREAM FISH , 1995 .

[5]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors , 2001 .

[6]  F. Rahel,et al.  The Hierarchical Nature of Community Persistence: A Problem of Scale , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[7]  I. Schlosser.  Flow regime, juvenile abundance, and the assemblage structure of stream fishes , 1985 .

[8]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[9]  B. Biggs,et al.  Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function , 2005 .

[10]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards , 2007 .

[11]  Julian D Olden,et al.  Rediscovering the species in community-wide predictive modeling. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  A. Arthington,et al.  Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia , 2000 .

[13]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A review of erosion and sediment transport models , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Wayne S. Davis,et al.  Biological assessment and criteria : tools for water resource planning and decision making , 1995 .

[15]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[16]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Incorporating ecological knowledge into ecoinformatics: An example of modeling hierarchically structured aquatic communities with neural networks , 2006, Ecol. Informatics.

[17]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[18]  M. Simons,et al.  IQQM—A hydrologic modelling tool for water resource and salinity management , 1996 .

[19]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Predictive Models of Fish Species Distributions: A Note on Proper Validation and Chance Predictions , 2002 .

[20]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Effects of drought on fish across axes of space, time and ecological complexity , 2003 .

[21]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics , 1991 .

[22]  Alison J. King,et al.  Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics , 2003 .

[23]  P. Unmack,et al.  Biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes , 2001 .

[24]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[25]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  PREDICTABILITY, CONSTANCY, AND CONTINGENCY OF PERIODIC PHENOMENA' , 1974 .

[26]  K. Rose.  WHY ARE QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND FISH POPULATIONS SO ELUSIVE , 2000 .

[27]  A. H. Arthington,et al.  Development and Application of a Predictive Model of Freshwater Fish Assemblage Composition to Evaluate River Health in Eastern Australia , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[28]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[29]  Thierry Oberdorff,et al.  Modelling habitat requirement of European fishes: do species have similar responses to local and regional environmental constraints? , 2005 .

[30]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  Factors influencing behavior and transferability of habitat models for a benthic stream fish , 1997 .

[31]  A. Arthington,et al.  Estimating local stream fish assemblage attributes: Sampling effort and efficiency at two spatial scales , 2006 .

[32]  J. Olden.  A Species‐Specific Approach to Modeling Biological Communities and Its Potential for Conservation , 2003 .

[33]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions , 2002 .

[34]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[36]  P. Humphries,et al.  Fish, Flows and Flood Plains: Links between Freshwater Fishes and their Environment in the Murray-Darling River System, Australia , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[37]  N. Poff,et al.  Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity , 1990 .

[38]  N. Milner,et al.  Variability in the distribution and abundance of stream salmonids, and the associated use of habitat models , 1993 .

[39]  M. Collares-Pereira,et al.  Gradients in stream fish assemblages across a Mediterranean landscape: contributions of environmental factors and spatial structure , 2002 .

[40]  J. Allan.  Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[41]  K. Fausch,et al.  Multiscale Processes Regulate Brassy Minnow Persistence in a Great Plains River , 2003 .

[42]  D. Magoulick,et al.  The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis , 2003 .

[43]  Ralph Mac Nally,et al.  Improving Inference in Ecological Research: Issues of Scope, Scale, and Model Validation , 2002 .

[44]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Patterns in the species–environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables , 2004 .

[45]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[46]  T. Foin,et al.  Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.