Co-construction of performance indicators for a circular city and its relation to a local action net

PurposeThis study examines how circular economy (CE) performance indicators are constructed in an urban context characterised by a multitude of conflicting interests and visions of urban development. It explores the process of constructing a shared consensus about the performance indicators in conditions of low contractibility, where intervention objectives and outcomes are not easily quantifiable because the object is ambiguous and cannot be fully specified in advance.Design/methodology/approachThe construction of performance indicators at the urban level is examined through the lens of an action net. Using group interviews, observations and documentary analysis, this study investigates the case of a CE initiative in the city of Milan.FindingsThe study demonstrates that in cases of low contractibility, the development of CE solutions requires actions that span across organisational boundaries, organised in an action net. As the action net unfolds, it is closely knotted with the construction of performance indicators, indicating a co-constitutive relationship between the two processes.Originality/valueThis interdisciplinary study contributes to the public sector accounting literature by exploring the complexity of performance indicator construction at the urban level. It further recognises performance measurement in cities as a dynamic and flexible process, in which the interconnected actions and involvement of multiple actants shape the composition of the indicators.

[1]  C. Parisi,et al.  Assessing and managing the impact of COVID-19: a study of six European cities participating in a circular economy project , 2021, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

[2]  Carlos Larrinaga,et al.  An ecological critique of accounting: The circular economy and COVID-19 , 2021, Critical Perspectives on Accounting.

[3]  The Circular Economy in Cities and Regions , 2020, OECD Urban Studies.

[4]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Trends in environmental accounting research within and outside of the accounting discipline , 2020 .

[5]  Special Issue of Accounting Forum: “Accounting for the Circular Economy” , 2020, Accounting Forum.

[6]  I. Thomson,et al.  Framing sustainable development challenges: accounting for SDG-15 in the UK , 2020, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

[7]  Hervé Corvellec,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on the contested realities of the circular economy , 2020, Culture and Organization.

[8]  Agata Dembek.  Knitting an action net to reduce plastic waste: reusable takeout food containers in New York City , 2020 .

[9]  K. Williams,et al.  The imaginary of the city versus messy realities , 2020 .

[10]  P. Suomala,et al.  Governmentality and performance for the smart city , 2019, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

[11]  I. Lapsley,et al.  Transforming the public sector: 1998–2018 , 2019, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

[12]  A. Górska,et al.  Rational and symbolic uses of performance measurement , 2019, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

[13]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  The emergence of an accounting practice: The fabrication of a government accrual accounting system , 2018 .

[14]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions , 2017 .

[15]  M. Arnaboldi,et al.  Rational and ritualistic use of key performance indicators in hybrid organizations , 2017 .

[16]  Nancy Bocken,et al.  Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition , 2017 .

[17]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[18]  M. Crang,et al.  Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU , 2015 .

[19]  I. Lapsley,et al.  Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge , 2015 .

[20]  Roland F. Speklé,et al.  THE USE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE , 2014 .

[21]  María José Zapata Campos,et al.  Changing La Chureca: Organizing City Resilience Through Action Nets , 2012 .

[22]  Michela Arnaboldi,et al.  Constructing performance measurement in the public sector , 2010 .

[23]  I. Lapsley,et al.  Accounting for the city , 2010 .

[24]  Chris Carter,et al.  Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities , 2010 .

[25]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Translation impossible? Accounting for a city project , 2010 .

[26]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  Asset management in cities: polyphony in action? , 2010 .

[27]  Sven Modell.  Institutional Research on Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector Accounting Literature: A Review and Assessment , 2009 .

[28]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  1new Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? , 2009 .

[29]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development , 2007 .

[30]  Kajsa Lindberg,et al.  Knotting the action net, or organizing between organizations , 2006 .

[31]  C. Hood,et al.  What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system , 2006 .

[32]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[33]  Barbara Czarniawska.  On Time, Space, and Action Nets , 2004 .

[34]  Sven Modell,et al.  Goals versus institutions: the development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector , 2003 .

[35]  Carol Propper,et al.  The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector , 2003 .

[36]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing , 2001 .

[37]  David Otley,et al.  Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .

[38]  Åge Johnsen,et al.  Implementation Mode and Local Government Performance Measurement: A Norwegian Experience , 1999 .

[39]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  Experts, networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: A story of the representation of three public hospitals , 1995 .

[40]  C. Hood.  The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[41]  Rod Coombs,et al.  Fabricating budgets: A study of the production of management budgeting in the national health service , 1992 .

[42]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[43]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations , 2018 .

[44]  B. Jacobsson,et al.  BUDGET IN A COLD CLIMATE. , 1989 .