Pebble Flow and Coolant Flow Analysis Based on a Fully Coupled Multiphysics Model

Abstract In pebble bed reactors (PBRs), pebble flow and coolant flow are highly correlated, and the behavior of each flow is strongly influenced by pebble-coolant interactions. Simulation of both flows in PBRs presents a multiphysics computational challenge because of the strong interplay between the flows. In this paper, a fully coupled multiphysics model is developed and applied to analyze the pebble flow and coolant flow in helium gas-cooled and fluoride salt-cooled PBR designs. A discrete element method is used to simulate the pebble motion to obtain the distribution of pebble density and velocity and the maximum contact stress on each pebble. Computational fluid dynamics is employed to simulate coolant dynamics to obtain the distribution of coolant velocity and pressure. The two methods are fully coupled through the calculation and exchange of pebble-coolant interactions at each time step. Thus, a fully coupled multiphysics computational framework is formulated. A scaled experimental fluoride salt-cooled reactor facility and a full-core helium gas-cooled HTR-10 reactor are simulated. Noticeable changes, such as higher pebble density in the cylindrical core region and more uniform vertical fluid speed profile due to the coupling effect, are observed compared to previous single-phase simulations alone without coupling. These changes suggest that the developed computational framework has higher fidelity compared with previous uncoupled methodology in analyzing pebble flow in PBRs. For the scaled experimental fluorite salt-cooled reactor facility calculation, similar hydraulic loss can be obtained as measured in the University of California, Berkeley, Pebble Recirculation Experiment (PREX), demonstrating the potential of the developed method in thermal-hydraulic analysis for PBRs.

[1]  D. Gidaspow Multiphase Flow and Fluidization , 1994 .

[2]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[3]  Wei Ji,et al.  A collective dynamics-based method for initial pebble packing in pebble flow simulations , 2012 .

[4]  Lei Shi,et al.  Thermal hydraulic calculation of the HTR-10 for the initial and equilibrium core , 2002 .

[5]  Seiichi Koshizuka,et al.  Large‐scale discrete element modeling in a fluidized bed , 2010 .

[6]  Janez Levec,et al.  Flow through packed bed reactors: 1. Single-phase flow , 2005 .

[7]  Chia-Jung Hsu Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 1981 .

[8]  R. D. Felice,et al.  The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems , 1994 .

[9]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems , 2008 .

[10]  O. Millet,et al.  Modeling Blockage of Particles in Conduit Constrictions: Dense Granular-Suspension Flow , 2010 .

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  Discrete particle-continuum fluid modelling of gas–solid fluidised beds , 2002 .

[12]  Joshua J. Cogliati,et al.  PEBBLES: A COMPUTER CODE FOR MODELING PACKING, FLOW AND RECIRCULATIONOF PEBBLES IN A PEBBLE BED REACTOR , 2006 .

[13]  D. Drew Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow , 1983 .

[14]  R. F. Benenati,et al.  Void fraction distribution in beds of spheres , 1962 .

[15]  A. Yu,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: Theoretical developments , 2007 .

[16]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  The PBMR steady-state and coupled kinetics core thermal-hydraulics benchmark test problems , 2006 .

[17]  D. Wolf,et al.  Force Schemes in Simulations of Granular Materials , 1996 .

[18]  Brahmeshwar Mishra,et al.  On the determination of contact parameters for realistic DEM simulations of ball mills , 2001 .

[19]  D. Knoll,et al.  Tightly Coupled Multiphysics Algorithms for Pebble Bed Reactors , 2010 .

[20]  H. Jakobsen Single Phase Flow , 2014 .

[21]  Joshua J. Cogliati,et al.  PEBBLES MECHANICS SIMULATION SPEEDUP , 2010 .

[22]  H. D. Gougar,et al.  Reactor Pressure Vessel Temperature Analysis for Prismatic and Pebble-Bed VHTR Designs , 2006 .

[23]  C. Rycroft,et al.  Analysis of granular flow in a pebble-bed nuclear reactor. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  C. Wen Mechanics of Fluidization , 1966 .

[25]  Javier Ortensi,et al.  Analysis of an Earthquake-Initiated-Transient in a PBR , 2009 .

[26]  C. Leroy,et al.  Evaluation of the volume of intersection of a sphere with a cylinder by elliptic integrals , 1990 .

[27]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .