Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis

This article reviews and synthesizes the uses of expert-based information in policy subsystems. The review begins by summarizing the different uses of information in the multiple streams theory, the punctuated equilibrium theory, the social construction theory, and the advocacy coalition framework. Three uses of expert-based information are identified as instrumental, learning, and political. The three uses of expert-based information are then compared across unitary, collaborative, and adversarial policy subsystems. This article synthesizes the findings in a set of propositions about the use of expert-based information in policy subsystems and about the factors that contribute to shifts from one policy subsystem to another.

[1]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  An Anatomy of Risk , 1978 .

[2]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[3]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Policy Paradox and Political Reason , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework , 1995 .

[5]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Policymakers' Use of Social Science Knowledge : symbolic or Instrumental? , 1977 .

[6]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[7]  Steven Cohen,et al.  Understanding Environmental Policy , 2006 .

[8]  Paul J. Quirk,et al.  Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[9]  F. Knight.  The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[10]  L. Bingham,et al.  The Challenges of Environmental Conflict Resolution , 2003 .

[11]  Rich Rf,et al.  Selective utilization of social science related information by federal policy-makers. , 1975 .

[12]  P. Klok,et al.  Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior: A contribution to the advocacy coalition framework , 2001 .

[13]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance , 2001 .

[14]  C. Weiss.  The many meanings of research utilization. , 1979 .

[15]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Comparing Policy Networks: Marine Protected Areas in California , 2005 .

[16]  M. Grbeša,et al.  Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions of collective action , 2006 .

[17]  G. Varner.  Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management , 2007 .

[18]  P. Sabatier.  Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change , 1987 .

[19]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[20]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[21]  Joost Berkhout,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2008 .

[22]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[23]  Kevin W. Hula.  Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics , 1999 .

[24]  R. Andersen,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers , 1991 .

[25]  E. E. Schattschneider.  The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America , 1960 .

[26]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[27]  R P Barke,et al.  Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  C. Weible,et al.  The Advocacy Coalition Framework , 2012, Theories of the Policy Process.

[29]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[30]  R. Karsh.  The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution , 1961 .

[31]  Dw Adams,et al.  Usable knowledge in public policy , 2004 .

[32]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[33]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Rational Choice , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[34]  Nabil Amara,et al.  New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies , 2004 .

[35]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems , 1998 .

[36]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[37]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989 , 2004 .

[38]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[39]  Robert F. Rich,et al.  Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization , 1991 .

[40]  Robert J. Duffy,et al.  Nuclear Politics in America: A History and Theory of Government Regulation , 1997 .

[41]  Daniel C. McCool,et al.  Public Policy Theories, Models, and Concepts: An Anthology , 1994 .

[42]  A. Schneider,et al.  Policy Design for Democracy , 1997 .

[43]  P. Sabatier.  Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .

[44]  M. Howlett,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems , 1996 .

[45]  Karin D. Knorr.  policy-makers use of social science knowledge: symbolic or instrumental? , 1976 .

[46]  W. Leach.  Is Devolution Democratic? Assessing Collaborative Environmental Management , 2004 .

[47]  M. Fernández-Giménez,et al.  Observations on the Workshop as a Means of Improving Communication Between Holders of Traditional and Scientific Knowledge , 2002, Environmental management.

[48]  John R. Ehrmann,et al.  Joint Fact-Finding and the Use of Technical Experts , 1999 .

[49]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Knowledge: Advocacy Organizations , 2001 .

[50]  Connie P. Ozawa,et al.  Recasting Science: Consensual Procedures in Public Policy Making , 1991 .

[51]  D. Lach,et al.  Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decisionmaking: A Regional Study , 2003 .

[52]  Robert G. Easierling.  An Anatomy of Risk , 1977 .

[53]  Kai N. Lee.  Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Kai N. Lee. 1993. Island Press, Washington, DC. 290 pages. ISBN: 1-59963-197-X. $25.00 , 1993 .

[54]  E. S. Redford.  Democracy in the administrative state , 1969 .

[55]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[56]  F. Fischer.  Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[57]  Christopher M. Weible,et al.  An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy , 2006 .

[58]  Sarah B. Pralle,et al.  Book Review: Branching Out, Digging In: Environmental Advocacy and Agenda Setting , 2008, Environmental Values.

[59]  E. Kolb.  A framework for political analysis , 1978 .