Reproducibility of the bladder shape and bladder shape changes during filling.

The feasibility of high precision radiotherapy to the bladder region is limited by bladder motion and volume changes. In the near future, we plan to begin treatment delivery of bladder cancer patients with the acquisition of a cone beam CT image on which the complete bladder will be semi-automatically localized. Subsequently, a bladder shape model that was developed in a previous study will be used for bladder localization and for the prediction of shape changes in the time interval between acquisition and beam delivery. For such predictions, knowledge about urinary inflow rate is required. Therefore, a series of MR images was acquired over 1 h with time intervals of 10 min for 18 healthy volunteers. To gain insight in the reproducibility of the bladder shape over longer periods of time, two additional MRI series were recorded for 10 of the volunteers. To a good approximation, the bladder volume increased linearly in time for all individuals. Despite receiving drinking instructions, we found a large variation in the inflow rate between individuals, ranging from 2.1 to 15 cc/min (mean value: 9 +/- 3 cc/min). In contrast, the intravolunteer variation was much smaller, with a mean standard deviation (SD) of 0.4 cc/min. The inflow rate was linearly correlated with age (negative slope). To study the reproducibility of the bladder shape, we compared bladder shapes of equal volume. For all individuals, the caudal part of the bladder was the most reproducible (variations<0.3 cm in all cases). The cranial and posterior parts of the bladder was much less reproducible, with local SD values up to approximately 1.2 cm for bladders with a volume of 200 cc. These large long-term variations were primarily caused by changes in position and filling of the small bowel and rectum. However, for short time intervals, the rectal filling was (nearly) constant. Therefore, the reproducibility of urinary inflow, combined with the previously developed shape model gives us an excellent tool to predict short-term shape changes. We intend to use this tool for further improvement of image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer patients.

[1]  R Miralbell,et al.  Radiotherapy of bladder cancer: relevance of bladder volume changes in planning boost treatment. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  L. Muren,et al.  Organ motion, set-up variation and treatment margins in radical radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  L. Muren,et al.  Treatment margins and treatment fractionation in conformal radiotherapy of muscle-invading urinary bladder cancer. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  M. Hulshof,et al.  Influence of bladder and rectal volume on spatial variability of a bladder tumor during radical radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R. Buchanan,et al.  An audit and evaluation of bladder movements during radical radiotherapy. , 1998, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[6]  W G Jones,et al.  Changes in target volume during radiotherapy treatment of invasive bladder carcinoma. , 1993, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[7]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  A model to predict bladder shapes from changes in bladder and rectal filling. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  H. Kaihola,et al.  Uterine Size Measured by Ultrasound During the Menstrual Cycle , 1975 .

[9]  H. von der Maase,et al.  Impact of changes in bladder and rectal filling volume on organ motion and dose distribution of the bladder in radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  R. Cowan,et al.  Bladder movement during radiation therapy for bladder cancer: implications for treatment planning. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Andrew A. Goldenberg,et al.  Force and position control of manipulators during constrained motion tasks , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Robert J. Renka,et al.  Interpolation of data on the surface of a sphere , 1984, TOMS.

[13]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  M van Herk,et al.  A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[15]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of delineation errors, setup errors, and organ motion during radiotherapy of bladder cancer. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.