Distinct functional properties of IkappaB alpha and IkappaB beta

The biological activity of the transcription factor NF-kappaB is controlled mainly by the IkappaB alpha and IkappaB beta proteins, which restrict NF-kappaB to the cytoplasm and inhibit its DNA binding activity. Here, we carried out experiments to determine and compare the mechanisms by which IkappaB alpha and IkappaB beta inhibit NF-kappaB-dependent transcriptional activation. First, we found that in vivo IkappaB alpha is a stronger inhibitor of NF-kappaB than is IkappaB beta. This difference is directly correlated with their abilities to inhibit NF-kappaB binding to DNA in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, IkappaB alpha, but not IkappaB beta, can remove NF-kappaB from functional preinitiation complexes in in vitro transcription experiments. Second, we showed that both IkappaBs function in vivo not only in the cytoplasm but also in the nucleus, where they inhibit NF-kappaB binding to DNA. Third, the inhibitory activity of IkappaB beta, but not that of IkappaB alpha, is facilitated by phosphorylation of the C-terminal PEST sequence by casein kinase II and/or by the interaction of NF-kappaB with high-mobility group protein I (HMG I) on selected promoters. The unphosphorylated form of IkappaB beta forms stable ternary complexes with NF-kappaB on the DNA either in vitro or in vivo. These experiments suggest that IkappaB alpha works as a postinduction repressor of NF-kappaB independently of HMG I, whereas IkappaB beta functions preferentially in promoters regulated by the NF-kappaB/HMG I complexes.

[1]  U. Zabel,et al.  Purified human IκB can rapidly dissociate the complex of the NF-κB transcription factor with its cognate DNA , 1990, Cell.

[2]  V. Bours,et al.  The oncoprotein Bcl-3 directly transactivates through κB motifs via association with DNA-binding p50B homodimers , 1993, Cell.

[3]  I. Sadowski,et al.  GAL4 fusion vectors for expression in yeast or mammalian cells. , 1992, Gene.

[4]  Interactions of a Rel protein with its inhibitor. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Sigler,et al.  Structure of NF-κB p50 homodimer bound to a κB site , 1998, Nature.

[6]  A. Baldwin,et al.  Mechanistic aspects of NF-κB regulation: The emerging role of phosphorylation and proteolysis , 1995 .

[7]  J. Hiscott,et al.  Phosphorylation of I k B a in the C-Terminal PEST Domain by Casein Kinase II Affects Intrinsic Protein Stability , 1996 .

[8]  R. Roeder,et al.  The role of general initiation factors in transcription by RNA polymerase II. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[9]  U. Sieben,et al.  STRUCTURE, REGULATION AND FUNCTION OF NF-1d3 , 1994 .

[10]  T. Maniatis,et al.  Identification of the rel family members required for virus induction of the human beta interferon gene , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  E. Krebs,et al.  Substrate specificity determinants for casein kinase II as deduced from studies with synthetic peptides. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  H. Suyang,et al.  Role of unphosphorylated, newly synthesized IκBβ in persistent activation of NF-κB , 1996 .

[13]  A. Baldwin,et al.  THE NF-κB AND IκB PROTEINS: New Discoveries and Insights , 1996 .

[14]  Gregory L. Verdine,et al.  Structure of the NF-κB p50 homodimer bound to DNA , 1995, Nature.

[15]  M. Grilli,et al.  NF-kappa B and Rel: participants in a multiform transcriptional regulatory system. , 1993, International review of cytology.

[16]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  Separation and partial characterization of three functional steps in transcription initiation by human RNA polymerase II. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  C. Ito,et al.  Three NF-χB sites in the IχB-α promoter are required for induction of gene expression by TNFα , 1994 .

[18]  David Baltimore,et al.  NF-κB: Ten Years After , 1996, Cell.

[19]  J. Hiscott,et al.  Differential Transcriptional Activation in Vitro by NF-B/Rel Proteins (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  T. Maniatis,et al.  Signal induced degradation of IkBa requires site-specific ubiquitina-tion , 1995 .

[21]  L. Baldi,et al.  Critical Role for Lysines 21 and 22 in Signal-induced, Ubiquitin-mediated Proteolysis of IB- (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  T. Maniatis,et al.  Site-Specific Phosphorylation of IκBα by a Novel Ubiquitination-Dependent Protein Kinase Activity , 1996, Cell.

[23]  P. Silver,et al.  Amino terminus of the yeast GAL4 gene product is sufficient for nuclear localization. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Inder M. Verma,et al.  R~~/NF-KB /IKB familv: intimate tales of association and dissociation , 1995 .

[25]  G. Nolan,et al.  The candidate proto-oncogene bcl-3 encodes a transcriptional coactivator that activates through NF-kappa B p50 homodimers. , 1993, Genes & development.

[26]  S. Haskill,et al.  Characterization of an immediate-early gene induced in adherent monocytes that encodes IκB-like activity , 1991, Cell.

[27]  J. Palvimo,et al.  Identification of sites on chromosomal protein HMG‐I phosphorylated by casein kinase II , 1989, FEBS letters.

[28]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  Functional steps in transcription initiation and reinitiation from the major late promoter in a HeLa nuclear extract. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  Dimitris Thanos,et al.  The High Mobility Group protein HMG I(Y) is required for NF-κB-dependent virus induction of the human IFN-β gene , 1992, Cell.

[30]  C. Caskey,et al.  Construction of plasmids that express E. coli beta-galactosidase in mammalian cells. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro , 1991, Cell.

[32]  J. Hiscott,et al.  The Role of the C-terminal Domain of IB in Protein Degradation and Stabilization (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  T. Maniatis,et al.  NF-κB: A lesson in family values , 1995, Cell.