Power laws reveal phase transitions in landscape controls of fire regimes

Understanding the environmental controls on historical wildfires, and how they changed across spatial scales, is difficult because there are no surviving explicit records of either weather or vegetation (fuels). Here we show how power laws associated with fire-event time series arise in limited domains of parameters that represent critical transitions in the controls on landscape fire. Comparison to a self-organized criticality model shows that the latter mimics historical fire only in a limited domain of criticality, and is not an adequate mechanism to explain landscape fire dynamics, which are shaped by both endogenous and exogenous controls. Our results identify a continuous phase transition in landscape controls, marked by power laws, and provide an ecological analogue to critical behaviour in physical and chemical systems. This explicitly cross-scale analysis provides a paradigm for identifying critical thresholds in landscape dynamics that may be crossed in a rapidly changing climate.

[1]  Loreto,et al.  Renormalization group approach to the critical behavior of the forest-fire model. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[2]  Leslie A. Real,et al.  Monte Carlo assessments of goodness-of-fit for ecological simulation models , 2003 .

[3]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Multi-scale controls of historical forest-fire regimes : new insights from fire-scar networks , 2011 .

[4]  M. Finney.  Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[5]  Maureen C. Kennedy,et al.  Using a stochastic model and cross-scale analysis to evaluate controls on historical low-severity fire regimes , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[7]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[8]  Mercedes Pascual,et al.  Broad scaling region in a spatial ecological system , 2003, Complex..

[9]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Forest fires: An example of self-organized critical behavior , 1998, Science.

[10]  A. Fisher,et al.  The Theory of critical phenomena , 1992 .

[11]  James H Brown,et al.  The fractal nature of nature: power laws, ecological complexity and biodiversity. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  Anne E. Black,et al.  Cross-Scale Analysis of Fire Regimes , 2007, Ecosystems.

[13]  Daniel E. Geer,et al.  Power. Law , 2012, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[14]  Jorge X Velasco-Hernández,et al.  Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[15]  A. Gill,et al.  Spatial scale invariance of southern Australian forest fires mirrors the scaling behaviour of fire-driving weather events , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Toward a Theory of Landscape Fire , 2011 .

[17]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  DROUGHT AND PACIFIC DECADAL OSCILLATION LINKED TO FIRE OCCURRENCE IN THE INLAND PACIFIC NORTHWEST , 2004 .

[18]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Spatial models for inferring topographic controls on historical low-severity fire in the eastern Cascade Range of Washington, USA , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Mercedes Pascual,et al.  Criticality and disturbance in spatial ecological systems. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  The Landscape Ecology of Fire , 2011 .

[21]  Drossel,et al.  Self-organized critical forest-fire model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[22]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Are rainforests self-organized in a critical state? , 1995 .

[23]  B. Malamud,et al.  Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Sandra D. Mitchell.  Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy , 2009 .